We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Driving lessons after driving for 20yrs?
Comments
-
If you refer to this one https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/worst-ever-rush-hour-crash-12958103 only three died. There are plenty more collisions where more than three have died on an urban road.Sandtree said:
Yesterday I could have provided the sources for the statistics but didn't keep the windows open over night... I cannot backup the claim that I've never heard of a 100 car pile up on an urban road... you'd need to trust me on that one.williamgriffin said:
Can you back your claims up?Sandtree said:
Depends on how you measure it... much lower rate of incidents but much higher consequences when incidents do occur... if you measure usage by distance travelled they represent 21% of road use but only 3% of known accidents... never heard of a 100 vehicle pileup on an urban road.Biggus_Dickus said:
Hope the last few pages haven’t put you off motorways forever. They remain the safest of all our roads.
Fatalities are not actually that disproportionately higher but thats more to do with most fatalities are people not in cars which you clearly don't get as much of on motorways0 -
Absolutely... but I said a 100 car pile up not 3 fatalities. Fatalities on urban roads are more common than on motordays thanks to pedestrians, cyclists etc who are much easier to kill than someone in a tin box with structural reinforcements, airbags etc.williamgriffin said:
If you refer to this one https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/worst-ever-rush-hour-crash-12958103 only three died. There are plenty more collisions where more than three have died on an urban road.Sandtree said:
Yesterday I could have provided the sources for the statistics but didn't keep the windows open over night... I cannot backup the claim that I've never heard of a 100 car pile up on an urban road... you'd need to trust me on that one.williamgriffin said:
Can you back your claims up?Sandtree said:
Depends on how you measure it... much lower rate of incidents but much higher consequences when incidents do occur... if you measure usage by distance travelled they represent 21% of road use but only 3% of known accidents... never heard of a 100 vehicle pileup on an urban road.Biggus_Dickus said:
Hope the last few pages haven’t put you off motorways forever. They remain the safest of all our roads.
Fatalities are not actually that disproportionately higher but thats more to do with most fatalities are people not in cars which you clearly don't get as much of on motorways0 -
Just a wild guess, but I'd say a number of the vehicle involved in that didn't have airbags etc to protect the occupants.Sandtree said:
Absolutely... but I said a 100 car pile up not 3 fatalities. Fatalities on urban roads are more common than on motordays thanks to pedestrians, cyclists etc who are much easier to kill than someone in a tin box with structural reinforcements, airbags etc.williamgriffin said:
If you refer to this one https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/worst-ever-rush-hour-crash-12958103 only three died. There are plenty more collisions where more than three have died on an urban road.Sandtree said:
Yesterday I could have provided the sources for the statistics but didn't keep the windows open over night... I cannot backup the claim that I've never heard of a 100 car pile up on an urban road... you'd need to trust me on that one.williamgriffin said:
Can you back your claims up?Sandtree said:
Depends on how you measure it... much lower rate of incidents but much higher consequences when incidents do occur... if you measure usage by distance travelled they represent 21% of road use but only 3% of known accidents... never heard of a 100 vehicle pileup on an urban road.Biggus_Dickus said:
Hope the last few pages haven’t put you off motorways forever. They remain the safest of all our roads.
Fatalities are not actually that disproportionately higher but thats more to do with most fatalities are people not in cars which you clearly don't get as much of on motorways
Shame your source disappeared overnight as you could have been worthy of a sensible discussion.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards