PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Old charge on house deeds, what to do?!

Hey all, I think I’ve come to the right place for advice on house selling process, so here goes!
My late father’s house is sale agreed, but there’s a delay in exchanging contracts due to a charge on the property from 1990 which we were completely unaware of. It is not connected to the mortgage, and the only details on the land registry title deeds state ‘NatWest securities department’ with an address at Lowry House in Manchester. Despite us writing, emailing and calling nobody at NatWest can help - they can’t find the account or give me the contact details of the right person to talk to. Any further delays could seriously jeopardise the sale. 
Has anyone else had a charge recorded on title deeds stating this NatWest department with this address? If so, how did you resolve it as we can’t get hold of anyone!
Much appreciation for any tips, pointing  in the right direction or general wise words! Thanks 😆

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    A complaint might help it get to somebody with the ability to sort it out.
  • Thank you for the suggestion, we’ll get onto that 👍
     I thought others may have come across this problem, but that doesn’t appear to be the case?!
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    WileOut said:
    Thank you for the suggestion, we’ll get onto that 👍
     I thought others may have come across this problem, but that doesn’t appear to be the case?!
    Not specifically, but it's fairly common for mortgages to be redeemed and the security not to have been discharged at the time. Which leaves the bank confused by requests to sign something years after they've removed all trace of the account from their records - if they can't work out why they've got a security over the property, they will tend to be paranoid that there might be a good reason for them to retain it. When of course it ought to be turned the other way round i.e. if they can't find a reason for having the security then it's obviously archaic and they should discharge it. It's probably beyond the capabilities of the normal mortgage department staff though so will need escalated to somebody who realises what's happened and what needs to be done. Ultimately it can be sorted via court though that would be a very slow last resort.
    "Securities department" suggests it was to do a mortgage of some sort.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.