We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
brake pads 70% worn at 15.5k miles? 2018 Mazda3
Comments
-
sweetsand said:daveyjp said:70% worn doesn't actually mean anything.I would also have thought on such a new car it would have a low pad warning, either an actual light or pads which squeal once they get too low.3
-
bigadaj said:sweetsand said:daveyjp said:70% worn doesn't actually mean anything.I would also have thought on such a new car it would have a low pad warning, either an actual light or pads which squeal once they get too low.4
-
daveyjp said:sweetsand said:daveyjp said:70% worn doesn't actually mean anything.I would also have thought on such a new car it would have a low pad warning, either an actual light or pads which squeal once they get too low.
in fact I have just found this from Mazda 3 site.Brake Pad Wear Indicator
When the disc brake pads become worn, the built-in wear indicators contact the disc plates. This causes a screeching noise to warn that the pads should be replaced.
0 -
My mazda 3 needed new front pads at 30k, some would say I brake 'enthusiastically'0
-
general point of advice, try to use engine braking as much as possible, where it is safe. engine will last a lot longer than brake pads.0
-
Mercdriver said:bigadaj said:sweetsand said:daveyjp said:70% worn doesn't actually mean anything.I would also have thought on such a new car it would have a low pad warning, either an actual light or pads which squeal once they get too low.1
-
treeroy said:general point of advice, try to use engine braking as much as possible, where it is safe. engine will last a lot longer than brake pads.
I agree with you to a certain extent. Using engine braking instead of the brake pedal demonstrates a good driving style, inasmuch as it proves you're doing "observation" well, looking well ahead, anticipating hazards, driving according to the conditions, etc. Certainly on a motorway, I pride myself on almost never having to touch the brakes. There is the counter-argument, however - brake pads are cheap, clutches/transmissions are not. Engine braking does place *marginally* more stress on the transmission components. In practice, it's probably negligible, and I'm in no way disagreeing with you - just thought I'd throw it out there :-)
0 -
I agree that engine breaking rules. This is how people of a certain vintage were taught to drive, changing down through the gears. My brakes were changed at 33,146 miles (required when I purchased the car) and then next at 118,667 - that's 85k on a set of pads.
I understand that the current way people are taught to drive is to brake and then change to 1st or 2nd gear once slowed, ready to draw away again (depending on whether slowed to a crawl or slowed to a stop).
0 -
Thanks for everyone's replies. It's a manual and I do engine brake at times. I'm a 35 year old Mazda driver if that's any indication of my driving style. Pretty convinced they've been changed prematurely now but oh well (expensive) lesson learnt.1
-
At least you have helped somebody to reach their sales targets.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards