We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
No documents for new roof or damp proof course
Comments
-
It'll cover the legal costs if the LA enforce lack of sign-off. But that's all.HomeownerDreamer said:Thanks for all the replies so far. I think my worry is that it looks like the work hasn't been signed off and fixing this would probably cause a significant delay. Is there a way around it such as indemnity insurance?0 -
So is it possible to get the insurance even when the work has been done so recently? I will be asking the seller all about it at the next viewing but would like to be able to present some options to quickly resolve it.0
-
Generally insurers want it to be at least a year after the works were done, to allow time for dust to settle (not that there's a huge risk of the council knocking on the door anyway).HomeownerDreamer said:So is it possible to get the insurance even when the work has been done so recently? I will be asking the seller all about it at the next viewing but would like to be able to present some options to quickly resolve it.
0 -
I actually don't know as I don't have a good understanding of this anyway. That's something I'll ask the seller at the next viewing. I thought it was just re-tiling but I will have to check to be sure.0
-
Does the building regs requirement only relate to structural and /or thermal changes? What if the roof is retiled but no other changes? I am possibly in a similar situation with a retiled roof myself.
0 -
Indemnity insurers?davidmcn said:
Generally insurers want it to be at least a year after the works were done, to allow time for dust to settle (not that there's a huge risk of the council knocking on the door anyway).HomeownerDreamer said:So is it possible to get the insurance even when the work has been done so recently? I will be asking the seller all about it at the next viewing but would like to be able to present some options to quickly resolve it.
ITYM "to absolutely minimise the risk of actually having to pay out"0 -
Solicitors appear to make a mountain out of molehills on stuff like this... I've had all kinds of questions from the solicitor requesting why I have no paperwork from double glazing that was installed 3 owners ago and is 15 years old. A lot of the questions asked by the solicitor would be intimidating to most buyers when my answer was N/A, but frankly a lot of it didn't actually require the paperwork the solicitor was asking for - it's just a question they ask every vendor to cover themselves.
My boiler was installed 3 years ago and I have no paperwork for it as I was living abroad, that answer was sufficient for my buyer as they love my house and are happy it's a good installation. Our flat roof was done 5 years ago, I don't have any paperwork because I didn't live in the house then and the previous owners didn't have it to hand. My buyers got a roofer to get up there and check it out because they love the house and don't want to lose out if it's good. The solicitor sold these two "issues" to them as if the building police were about to come and demolish the place after the new owners had been dragged through the courts for not having legal paperwork to prove their new house's boiler and roof weren't criminal.
Is the roof in good nick? If you're not sure, pay a roofer to check it out for you and write you a report for peace of mind (and nothing else). If it's good, how much do you love the place? Are you going to be heartbroken if you lose it because of a piece of paper? Same for the boiler.1 -
If more than 25% of the tiles have been removed and no other work carried out, building regs is still a requirement. In the OP's case, as the work has only recently been completed, getting the work signed off shouldn't be a problem - Most competent roofers should be able to self certify their work, if not, a quick call to Building Control should see someone come out to inspect.DRP said: Does the building regs requirement only relate to structural and /or thermal changes? What if the roof is retiled but no other changes? I am possibly in a similar situation with a retiled roof myself.
Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
