We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tools to plan for retirement?
Comments
-
..I will have to google "Monte Carlo" analysis and see if I can get my rather simple brain to understand it!
.."It's everybody's fault but mine...."0 -
It isn't perfect of course....
https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0113/planning-your-retirement-using-the-monte-carlo-simulation.aspx
1 -
It is possible to run Monte Carlo analysis in Excel.cobson said:
Your other problem is that spreadsheets hide sequence of return risk - even using 'safe' return rates doesn't make you immune to this. Thats why the specialist tools use techniques like Monte Carlo analysis to try and gauge the risk.Stubod said:The only problem with this is that if you work on "safe" / worst case numbers, (eg I use 4% inflation and 1% interest / growth on all savings and investments), then potentially you are not spending enough money!"Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0 -
I previously used firecalc, firesim and retireeasy. Don't need those any more but they were very helpful getting me on the right track.I'd also say if you need to use UK data then you have the wrong investment strategy because you should be investing globally (and maybe in specific industries and companies) ,so that the U.K. economy is a very small part of your investments, and thus if you have the requirement to source the last hundred years of FTSE100 or similar U.K. data then it's like choosing which hammer to knock a nail in when you should be using screws.3
-
You could always start the spreadsheet with a couple of -20% returns in years 1 and 2 and a small recovery afterwards. If the plan works in that scenario then it should pretty much past muster.cobson said:
Your other problem is that spreadsheets hide sequence of return risk - even using 'safe' return rates doesn't make you immune to this. Thats why the specialist tools use techniques like Monte Carlo analysis to try and gauge the risk.Stubod said:The only problem with this is that if you work on "safe" / worst case numbers, (eg I use 4% inflation and 1% interest / growth on all savings and investments), then potentially you are not spending enough money!0 -
That is pretty well my approach.garmeg said:
You could always start the spreadsheet with a couple of -20% returns in years 1 and 2 and a small recovery afterwards. If the plan works in that scenario then it should pretty much past muster.cobson said:
Your other problem is that spreadsheets hide sequence of return risk - even using 'safe' return rates doesn't make you immune to this. Thats why the specialist tools use techniques like Monte Carlo analysis to try and gauge the risk.Stubod said:The only problem with this is that if you work on "safe" / worst case numbers, (eg I use 4% inflation and 1% interest / growth on all savings and investments), then potentially you are not spending enough money!I reckon (& have read elsewhere!) if you can get through your first 10 y, you’ll probably do well enough. I am absolutely certain it is possible to overthink this stuff (hence why I am on here most days, eh!).....Of course no one can be certain we won’t have a 10 year recession ahead of us....but I remain positive, and also “globally invested”
Plan for tomorrow, enjoy today!0 -
Do you have a link to this? Sounds interesting.Dandytf said:OP
I uses EPA's ILife Saving+Spending Tool,
Which allows me to view effect of frozen DB and Active DC schemes.
I tend to use Excel. Perhaps we should all look at sharing a vanilla spreadsheet of our workings and work together to create a super dooper version.1 -
It's possible to do lots of things in Excel but I'm not sure that it would be the optimal choice nor what you would gain from the exercise.kinger101 said:
It is possible to run Monte Carlo analysis in Excel.cobson said:
Your other problem is that spreadsheets hide sequence of return risk - even using 'safe' return rates doesn't make you immune to this. Thats why the specialist tools use techniques like Monte Carlo analysis to try and gauge the risk.Stubod said:The only problem with this is that if you work on "safe" / worst case numbers, (eg I use 4% inflation and 1% interest / growth on all savings and investments), then potentially you are not spending enough money!0 -
You need UK inflation dataAnotherJoe said:I previously used firecalc, firesim and retireeasy. Don't need those any more but they were very helpful getting me on the right track.I'd also say if you need to use UK data then you have the wrong investment strategy because you should be investing globally (and maybe in specific industries and companies) ,so that the U.K. economy is a very small part of your investments, and thus if you have the requirement to source the last hundred years of FTSE100 or similar U.K. data then it's like choosing which hammer to knock a nail in when you should be using screws.0 -
I think it's far from perfect, even for someone that uses MC modelling regularly and has a handle on reasonable input parameters.cobson said:It isn't perfect of course....
https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0113/planning-your-retirement-using-the-monte-carlo-simulation.aspx0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

