We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Ns&i
rob78
Posts: 59 Forumite
Hi, NS&I income bonds are 1.15% and direct saver is 1%. The name bonds makes me nervous, is it a normal savings account? If so why would anyone select a direct saver over a income bonds account?
Thanks
Rob
Thanks
Rob
0
Comments
-
NS&I Income Bonds is a normal easy access saver with a couple conditions attached:
- you can only deposit or withdraw in sums of at least £500
- interest is paid monthly into a different account (current account, NS&I Direct Saver etc), i.e. doesn't compound
1 -
NS&I Income Bonds have a minimum transaction value of £500. If someone did not have £500 to deposit they could open a Direct Saver account. The Income Bond account is fine and there is no reason to be nervous as the money is 100% safe here.rob78 said:Hi, NS&I income bonds are 1.15% and direct saver is 1%. The name bonds makes me nervous, is it a normal savings account? If so why would anyone select a direct saver over a income bonds account?
Thanks
Rob
There are several threads here with information and opinion and the NS&I website is very informative.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/search?adv=1&search=NS%26I&title=&author=&cat=all&tags=&discussion_d=1&comment_c=1&discussion_poll=1&within=1+day&date=
0 -
Thanks Colsten, income bonds it is then!0
-
Also covered in this thread:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6176036/are-ns-i-income-bonds-better-than-the-highest-interest-easy-access-savings-accounts/p1
Never let the perfume of the premium overpower the odour of the risk0 -
Just adding my recent experience of both these accounts. Initial opening Funds transfer took at least a week to show as 'available funds' in both accounts, which was slightly worrying. Now trying to make a withdrawal from the Direct Saver and it's most certainly not easy access in the modern day sense. They say if you make a request on a Monday, for example, your funds will be available on the following banking day.......by the end of that day. So, no faster payments for the Direct Saver, it's like the olden days where your funds drop into a Black Hole of mystery for a couple of days. They even have a withdrawal calculator to give you an idea when your funds will be available for you, so it irks me a little when these are pushed as instant access / easy access. I made a request online yesterday at 10am thinking I'd have the funds later that day at worst and it's after Midday on Day 2 and I'm still waiting, thinking now these funds won't appear until a minute before Midnight. My fault, I should have read the Withdrawal information and seen the calculator, but just to be aware, definitely not 'instant access'.0
-
Faster Payments means 'by close of next working day', although for most transfers between direct participants of the scheme it's close to instantaneous, as explained at https://www.fasterpayments.org.uk/faqs
How long do Faster Payments take?
Provided the sending and receiving bank/building society are Direct Participants of Faster Payments, payments are usually available almost immediately, although they can sometimes take up to two hours.
[...]
As a minimum, all financial institutions in the UK must abide by the Payment Services Directive (PSD) - this states that any payments made by mobile, internet or phone banking (including standing orders) must arrive by the end of the following business day at the latest.
Instant or easy access means that there's no need to give advance notice of withdrawals and doesn't signify that withdrawn funds will arrive at a certain speed....5 -
NSI is not a bank in the true sense. Only risen to the fore as the the UK needs to borrow to fund the crisis. .kUrGaN_UK said:Just adding my recent experience of both these accounts. Initial opening Funds transfer took at least a week to show as 'available funds' in both accounts, which was slightly worrying. Now trying to make a withdrawal from the Direct Saver and it's most certainly not easy access in the modern day sense. They say if you make a request on a Monday, for example, your funds will be available on the following banking day.......by the end of that day. So, no faster payments for the Direct Saver, it's like the olden days where your funds drop into a Black Hole of mystery for a couple of days. They even have a withdrawal calculator to give you an idea when your funds will be available for you, so it irks me a little when these are pushed as instant access / easy access. I made a request online yesterday at 10am thinking I'd have the funds later that day at worst and it's after Midday on Day 2 and I'm still waiting, thinking now these funds won't appear until a minute before Midnight. My fault, I should have read the Withdrawal information and seen the calculator, but just to be aware, definitely not 'instant access'.0 -
Thrugelmir said:NSI is not a bank in the true sense. Only risen to the fore as the the UK needs to borrow to fund the crisis. .The UK does not need to borrow to fund the crisis. It can fund it with either cash (via QE) or borrowing, or a mixture of the two. It is in fact using a mixture.Within the part of funding that comes from borrowing, NS&I is a more expensive form of borrowing than gilts. NS&I has come to the fore because NS&I interest rates have been held steady, when other rates have been falling, to help savers. It would have saved public money to cut NS&I rates in line with the rest of the savings market and, when as a result less money was deposited with NS&I, instead borrowed more cheaply by issuing more gilts. It was a deliberate policy to keep NS&I rates up (and as it happens, one of the few government policies I agree with).
1 -
Why, even after you have discovered the withdrawal calculator, are you complaining that you will get your withdrawal when NS&I say you would get it?kUrGaN_UK said:Just adding my recent experience of both these accounts. Initial opening Funds transfer took at least a week to show as 'available funds' in both accounts, which was slightly worrying. Now trying to make a withdrawal from the Direct Saver and it's most certainly not easy access in the modern day sense. They say if you make a request on a Monday, for example, your funds will be available on the following banking day.......by the end of that day. So, no faster payments for the Direct Saver, it's like the olden days where your funds drop into a Black Hole of mystery for a couple of days. They even have a withdrawal calculator to give you an idea when your funds will be available for you, so it irks me a little when these are pushed as instant access / easy access. I made a request online yesterday at 10am thinking I'd have the funds later that day at worst and it's after Midday on Day 2 and I'm still waiting, thinking now these funds won't appear until a minute before Midnight. My fault, I should have read the Withdrawal information and seen the calculator, but just to be aware, definitely not 'instant access'.
Why, if you have an issue with the deposit and withdrawal processing times NS&I have, did you choose to deposit money with NS&I?6 -
A poster who never quite seems to grasp the correct information.dont_look_now said:Thrugelmir said:NSI is not a bank in the true sense. Only risen to the fore as the the UK needs to borrow to fund the crisis. .The UK does not need to borrow to fund the crisis. It can fund it with either cash (via QE) or borrowing, or a mixture of the two. It is in fact using a mixture.Within the part of funding that comes from borrowing, NS&I is a more expensive form of borrowing than gilts. NS&I has come to the fore because NS&I interest rates have been held steady, when other rates have been falling, to help savers. It would have saved public money to cut NS&I rates in line with the rest of the savings market and, when as a result less money was deposited with NS&I, instead borrowed more cheaply by issuing more gilts. It was a deliberate policy to keep NS&I rates up (and as it happens, one of the few government policies I agree with).
The NS&I was , before Covid, told by the Government to raise £6 billion extra this financial year .
Now the Government has told NS&I to raise £ 35 billion by next April in order to help finance Covid expenditure. So, of course the Government is using NS&I as a "borrowing" tool ! And why not , especially as the plan is working ( in all my time using NS&I , I have never seen it so highly used even though it has always had about 25 million savers in recent years, much more now of course).
And the Govt does not agree that cutting NS&I interest rates should be lowered in line with other savings "banks" and neither do I nor most observers. If that were so, would an agency of The Chancellor of the Exchequer (NS&I ) be drumming up business for savers ? No, it would not.
True, it is not a Bank in the strict sense but it has been referred to as the UK's Savings Bank for decades. I use it because of the fact that I need the extra protection far above the normal FSCS protection limits. But there is no doubt that NS&I, especially with its new Govt strategy, will play a part in the the wide range of measures which the Govt will use to finance the Covid debts.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

