PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

purchasing a bit of land to extend back garden

eidand
eidand Posts: 1,023 Forumite
Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
edited 7 August 2020 at 10:53AM in House buying, renting & selling
Hi all,
this is what I am wondering .... the property I am in the process of buying has a small - ish back garden, which backs into the woods. All the nearby properties are in line in terms of back gardens, all except one which has extended about 6 meters in length. I don't know if they've done it correctly by buying it off the council or not.  I might have a chat with them, once I've lived there a few months. 

I would like to do something similar and get a small plot of land of maybe 6 meters over 8 which would give roughly 50 sq meters to be added to the back garden.
What I was thinking is to talk to my solicitors and see how we could approach this, although I am not sure what to offer for that kind of land. Maybe 5k plus the council's solicitors fees and see what they say.

Any advice, things to consider, what to do or not to do? Are they likely to accept or are there things I could mention / do to improve the chance of getting this accepted ?
The land belongs to the Dorset council, if that makes any difference.
«1

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Easiest just to ask the neighbours as a first step.
  • eidand
    eidand Posts: 1,023 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 7 August 2020 at 10:53AM
    davidmcn said:
    Easiest just to ask the neighbours as a first step.
    yeah, it's on my list, however if they've done it the other way they may not be so happy with me going over and questioning this. Maybe not the best start with new neighbours :)
  • greatcrested
    greatcrested Posts: 5,925 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Go and introduce yourself and let it come up in conversation.

    Happy Birthday Cake Images Pictures 2016 Free Download

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    (don't offer cake to any council officers though)
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    My bet is that they don't have permission. And that the council won't sell any land to you. 

    But I could be wrong. So discussing it with those neighbours may be a good first step. Just be aware that if they are adversely possessing the ground, they may not be that comfortable when the topic come up, so you'll have to convince them you tacitly approve.

    People nicking bits of ground off councils is quite frequent, as they often own the odd-ends of land here and there at the back of people's gardens. Often councils, rather than pursuing eviction, will instead sell a license to use the land i.e. assert their ownership rights in the lowest cost way possible, and put off an eviction to the next generation. But that may be less likely if it's recreational woodland than, say, an overgrown strip between fences.
  • eidand
    eidand Posts: 1,023 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 7 August 2020 at 12:00PM
    My bet is that they don't have permission. And that the council won't sell any land to you. 

    But I could be wrong. So discussing it with those neighbours may be a good first step. Just be aware that if they are adversely possessing the ground, they may not be that comfortable when the topic come up, so you'll have to convince them you tacitly approve.

    People nicking bits of ground off councils is quite frequent, as they often own the odd-ends of land here and there at the back of people's gardens. Often councils, rather than pursuing eviction, will instead sell a license to use the land i.e. assert their ownership rights in the lowest cost way possible, and put off an eviction to the next generation. But that may be less likely if it's recreational woodland than, say, an overgrown strip between fences.
    That's exactly my feeling too which is why I am a bit uncomfortable with the whole situation. This bit of land is pretty overgrown and not really used for anything, the entire row of houses could extend their garden and it wouldn't affect anything. I am just the type that would rather buy it than just nick it.
  • martindow
    martindow Posts: 10,533 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    davidmcn said:
    (don't offer cake to any council officers though)
    Don't they like cake?

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My bet is that they don't have permission. And that the council won't sell any land to you. 
    Pretty easy to check by looking at the Land Registry whether the neighbours actually have title or not.
  • The enclosure of open space (whether tended or not) as a garden is a change of use and requires planning permission.  In addition the erection of fencing may, depending upon location and height, also require consent.   There was a recent Daily Fail story where someone in (I think) Livingston had lost an appeal on this point and received an enforcement notice.  Caution is therefore required.
    Health Warning: I am happy to occasionally comment on building matters on the forum. However it is simply not possible to give comprehensive professional technical advice on an internet forum. Any comments made are therefore only of a general nature to point you in what is hopefully the right direction.
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    eidand said:
    My bet is that they don't have permission. And that the council won't sell any land to you. 

    But I could be wrong. So discussing it with those neighbours may be a good first step. Just be aware that if they are adversely possessing the ground, they may not be that comfortable when the topic come up, so you'll have to convince them you tacitly approve.

    People nicking bits of ground off councils is quite frequent, as they often own the odd-ends of land here and there at the back of people's gardens. Often councils, rather than pursuing eviction, will instead sell a license to use the land i.e. assert their ownership rights in the lowest cost way possible, and put off an eviction to the next generation. But that may be less likely if it's recreational woodland than, say, an overgrown strip between fences.
    That's exactly my feeling too which is why I am a bit uncomfortable with the whole situation. This bit of land is pretty overgrown and not really used for anything, the entire row of houses could extend their garden and it wouldn't affect anything. I am just the type that would rather buy it than just nick it.
    You can be sure the land is used for something; perhaps not by people, but it will certainly be a habitat for other living things. So, if every house extended its garden, it would affect something, just not a 'something' you place any value on.
    There is also an argument saying that gardens can actually increase habitat diversity, which would be the case if everyone gardened in a wildlife-friendly way. Sadly, any hour looking at Rightmove convinces me that not even 50% really do.
    'Recreational woodland,' if that's what it is, also doesn't mean that people must have access to all of it. Take any area of woods, like the Forest of Dean or the edges of Dartmoor, and although large swathes have public open access, there are areas not easily accessible which are vital retreats and breeding areas.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.