We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
Large cash withdrawals from Nationwide...
Comments
-
Ok, let me rephrase that. Older voters are more likely to get out to vote than 18 to 24 year olds, and the percentage of the population over 65 is increasing. I'm not going to try to find evidence for that, it's repeated at every election. Any subject that caused older voters to vote the same way en masse would most certainly win an election for any given party (better start putting this in my posts) in my opinion. 🙂I came into this world with nothing and I've got most of it left.0
-
Just watching "Can't pay........". Fella is found hiding under the bed and, when they find him, says 'Ok, no need to go through my stuff, I'll pay". Gets on the phone and, shortly after a woman arrives with a carrier bag with ten grand in it.The agents didn't say 'Hello, hello, ten grand in cash?. What's that all about, then?, they just snatched the cash and left. All above board, I'm sure.😄I came into this world with nothing and I've got most of it left.2
-
Even if the assertion about the grey vote was true, it would be preposterous to suggest that older people aren't comfortable with electronic payment methods. Fair enough, there are probably more older than younger people who still prefer cash but to throw us all into "can't cope with technology" bucket is a bit far fetched.eskbanker said:
haven't seen anything that would endorse your view that "The grey vote is, by far, the largest vote", what sources do you claim to support that?
I am rapidly approaching 70* myself, and only the other day I re-deposited some cash that had been sitting in my purse for at least a year. Just about the only cash I need these days is the £1 coin for shopping trolleys. I even pay tips electronically now. Even small businesses, e.g. my one-man band window cleaner, prefer electronic payment these days, and with Covid-19, cash has become incrementally less welcome.
*Though may be I don't belong to the grey vote yet? How's it defined, anyway?
1 -
The talk about votes is a complete red herring anyway - successive governments remain committed to reducing money-laundering, which in turn imposes greater controls on cash but makes no attempt to 'ban' it! Anyone, 'grey' or otherwise, who believes that unimpeded access to substantial quantities of cash would be a key election issue is likely to be somewhat unrepresentative of the majority IMHO....1
-
Well....we're all entitled to our opinions🤪I came into this world with nothing and I've got most of it left.0
-
Yes the population of over-65s is increasing, but those new over-65s are the under-65s of last year, and don't suddenly change their habits or opinions on their 65th birthday.Shakin_Steve said:Ok, let me rephrase that. Older voters are more likely to get out to vote than 18 to 24 year olds, and the percentage of the population over 65 is increasing. I'm not going to try to find evidence for that, it's repeated at every election. Any subject that caused older voters to vote the same way en masse would most certainly win an election for any given party (better start putting this in my posts) in my opinion. 🙂
Eco Miser
Saving money for well over half a century4 -
Maybe not, but over 66's (which is the present age at which state pension is received, not 65) might change their habits or opinions once the government and opposition have differing views on the triple lock or such. That's why governments are very careful to try to keep their votes.Eco_Miser said:
Yes the population of over-65s is increasing, but those new over-65s are the under-65s of last year, and don't suddenly change their habits or opinions on their 65th birthday.Shakin_Steve said:Ok, let me rephrase that. Older voters are more likely to get out to vote than 18 to 24 year olds, and the percentage of the population over 65 is increasing. I'm not going to try to find evidence for that, it's repeated at every election. Any subject that caused older voters to vote the same way en masse would most certainly win an election for any given party (better start putting this in my posts) in my opinion. 🙂I came into this world with nothing and I've got most of it left.0 -
Damn. I forgot to change my habits and opinions when I reached state pension age (which is, btw, neither 66 nor 65 at present, but still something in between). Worse still, I don't have any plans to do so anytime soonShakin_Steve said:
Maybe not, but over 66's (which is the present age at which state pension is received, not 65) might change their habits or opinions once the government and opposition have differing views on the triple lock or such. That's why governments are very careful to try to keep their votes.Eco_Miser said:
Yes the population of over-65s is increasing, but those new over-65s are the under-65s of last year, and don't suddenly change their habits or opinions on their 65th birthday.Shakin_Steve said:Ok, let me rephrase that. Older voters are more likely to get out to vote than 18 to 24 year olds, and the percentage of the population over 65 is increasing. I'm not going to try to find evidence for that, it's repeated at every election. Any subject that caused older voters to vote the same way en masse would most certainly win an election for any given party (better start putting this in my posts) in my opinion. 🙂
0 -
Well done, old thing. This old boy changes his opinions quite frequently according to the ever changing world, otherwise I might be considered an old fuddy duddy stick in the mud.colsten said:
Damn. I forgot to change my habits and opinions when I reached state pension age (which is, btw, neither 66 nor 65 at present, but still something in between). Worse still, I don't have any plans to do so anytime soonShakin_Steve said:
Maybe not, but over 66's (which is the present age at which state pension is received, not 65) might change their habits or opinions once the government and opposition have differing views on the triple lock or such. That's why governments are very careful to try to keep their votes.Eco_Miser said:
Yes the population of over-65s is increasing, but those new over-65s are the under-65s of last year, and don't suddenly change their habits or opinions on their 65th birthday.Shakin_Steve said:Ok, let me rephrase that. Older voters are more likely to get out to vote than 18 to 24 year olds, and the percentage of the population over 65 is increasing. I'm not going to try to find evidence for that, it's repeated at every election. Any subject that caused older voters to vote the same way en masse would most certainly win an election for any given party (better start putting this in my posts) in my opinion. 🙂
I came into this world with nothing and I've got most of it left.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

