We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
No bank account and cant open one so no BBL?
Comments
-
bazzyb said:Where did you bank your income from your trading from 14th February until lockdown?0
-
danielle_128 said:As far as I can see, what has happened here is this:
The banks have taken billions from tax payers and are doing their best to hold on to that money. The scheme was intended to help those whose business has been affected by coronavirus.
There is a strong case for people to complain - Id suggest speaking with all of the banks and recording or getting communications in writing before proceeding to complain.
If you are being refused a BBL because you are unable to open an accoun then that bank is trying to hold on to tax payers money which is intended to help businesses affected by coronavirus.
Please read the below:In particular, the FCA said there was no requirement in BBLS for lenders to conduct creditworthiness or affordability checks, contrary to the FCA’s normal rules on creditworthiness assessments for regulated credit agreements.
The FCA said it understood the FOS would take into account the schemes’ requirements when handling any complaints, and asked the ombudsman to acknowledge that the schemes require lenders to take a different approach to lending. In its reply (1 page / 169KB PDF), the FOS made the required confirmation.
Separately, the Lending Standards Board (LSB) issued an update on how its Standards of Lending Practice for business customers give effect to the requirements of the BBLS.
4 -
As far as I can see, what has happened here is this:
The banks have taken billions from tax payers and are doing their best to hold on to that money.That is wrong.
The banks have not taken billions from the tax payers. The banks are supplying the credit for the BBL. It is only if BBLs fail and recovery via normal means is not possible that the banks then turn to the treasury.
There is a strong case for people to complainYou do not have a strong case to complain. Indeed, what you actually proposed in your initial post was potentially fraud.
1 - using the BBL to then draw money from a company to pay for personal debts.
2 - applying for a BBL despite never actually trading.
3 - Wrongful trading rules would be breached.
In particular, the FCA said there was no requirement in BBLS for lenders to conduct creditworthiness or affordability checks, contrary to the FCA’s normal rules on creditworthiness assessments for regulated credit agreements.The BBL is not credit scored or credit assessed. However, bank accounts are. And a bank is within its rights to refuse banking facilities.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
Jonesy1977 said:danielle_128 said:As far as I can see, what has happened here is this:
The banks have taken billions from tax payers and are doing their best to hold on to that money. The scheme was intended to help those whose business has been affected by coronavirus.
There is a strong case for people to complain - Id suggest speaking with all of the banks and recording or getting communications in writing before proceeding to complain.
If you are being refused a BBL because you are unable to open an accoun then that bank is trying to hold on to tax payers money which is intended to help businesses affected by coronavirus.
Please read the below:In particular, the FCA said there was no requirement in BBLS for lenders to conduct creditworthiness or affordability checks, contrary to the FCA’s normal rules on creditworthiness assessments for regulated credit agreements.
The FCA said it understood the FOS would take into account the schemes’ requirements when handling any complaints, and asked the ombudsman to acknowledge that the schemes require lenders to take a different approach to lending. In its reply (1 page / 169KB PDF), the FOS made the required confirmation.
Separately, the Lending Standards Board (LSB) issued an update on how its Standards of Lending Practice for business customers give effect to the requirements of the BBLS.
1 -
I think the moral of the story here is dont ask the internet0
-
danielle_128 said:I think the moral of the story here is dont ask the internet
What you've got is the truth, the fact that it isn't what you wanted to hear doesn't make it wrong.3 -
Does anyone have anything constructive, helpful or informative to add to this thread?0
-
danielle_128 said:Does anyone have anything constructive, helpful or informative to add to this thread?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1
-
danielle_128 said:I am in a dead economy all original prospects dried up, finding it harder to find potential customers
1 -
danielle_128 said:Does anyone have anything constructive, helpful or informative to add to this thread?6
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards