We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
New build - garden sloping, not sure of rights?
Comments
-
buel10 said:Interesting find here....
NHBC-STANDARDS-GARDENS-pdf
https://www.newbuildinspections.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/chapter-9-2.-NHBC-STANDARDS-GARDENS-pdf.pdf
GARDEN AREAS 9.2 - D4 Garden areas shall be stable Items to be taken into account include: (a) slopes Unless the stability of new or existing slopes has been determined by an Engineer in accordance with Technical Requirement R5 the following maximum gradients apply: • unsupported granular soil should be 5° less than its natural angle of repose • unsupported cohesive soil should not exceed 9° (1:6). (b) retaining structures Where it is necessary to provide retaining structures to ensure the stability of the ground they should be designed in accordance with Clause D3.
To this layperson, this looks like it helps me?So, to save the rest of us digging into the NHBC standards, what does Clause D say?Always bear in mind that the NHBC and similar bodies are funded by the industry. They write some wonderful-sounding stuff, but when the SHTF they remember where their money comes from.I found this with a trade body for glass and glazing. They were as useful to me as the proverbial chocolate tea pot when I needed arbitration. Because they knew I'd win, my case was deemed 'unsuitable,' with no further explanation. Mind you, I took that as a good sign and left their member £5.5k short. Then, everyone was happy. The glazing company got away with shoddy service and still broke even, the trade body saved an embarrassing situation and I saved the money I didn't pay!
1 -
Davesnave said:buel10 said:Interesting find here....
NHBC-STANDARDS-GARDENS-pdf
https://www.newbuildinspections.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/chapter-9-2.-NHBC-STANDARDS-GARDENS-pdf.pdf
GARDEN AREAS 9.2 - D4 Garden areas shall be stable Items to be taken into account include: (a) slopes Unless the stability of new or existing slopes has been determined by an Engineer in accordance with Technical Requirement R5 the following maximum gradients apply: • unsupported granular soil should be 5° less than its natural angle of repose • unsupported cohesive soil should not exceed 9° (1:6). (b) retaining structures Where it is necessary to provide retaining structures to ensure the stability of the ground they should be designed in accordance with Clause D3.
To this layperson, this looks like it helps me?So, to save the rest of us digging into the NHBC standards, what does Clause D say?Always bear in mind that the NHBC and similar bodies are funded by the industry. They write some wonderful-sounding stuff, but when the SHTF they remember where their money comes from.I found this with a trade body for glass and glazing. They were as useful to me as the proverbial chocolate tea pot when I needed arbitration. Because they knew I'd win, my case was deemed 'unsuitable,' with no further explanation. Mind you, I took that as a good sign and left their member £5.5k short. Then, everyone was happy. The glazing company got away with shoddy service and still broke even, the trade body saved an embarrassing situation and I saved the money I didn't pay!
FREESTANDING WALLS AND RETAINING STRUCTURES 9.2 -
D3 Where provided, freestanding walls and retaining structures shall be adequate for their intended purpose Items to be taken into account include: (a) design Freestanding walls should be designed in accordance with: BS 5628 Code of practice for use of masonry, or BRE Good Building Guide 14. All retaining structures, more than 600mm high, should be designed by an Engineer in accordance with Technical Requirement R5. Gabion and crib structures should not be used to provide support to homes, garages, roads, drives, car parking areas and drainage systems. Retaining structures should be designed in accordance with: BS 5930 Code of practice for site investigations, and BS 8110 Structural use of concrete, or BS 5628 Code of practice for use of masonry.
Where appropriate, brickwork and blockwork retaining walls may be designed in accordance with BRE Good Building Guide 27. (b) guarding Guarding should be provided where structures are retaining land more than 600mm high to which people have access. Where steps and guarding are provided they should be designed in accordance with Sitework clause 9.2 - S7. (c) planters Where planters are provided they should be designed to adequately support the volume of retained soil and the plant species
Also, LOVE the window company story - brilliant!!0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards