UK DCA Chasing me for Traffic Fine in Italy!!

pogofish

Scrapit said:

In this case I wouldnt even read the confusing newbies thread, just ignore the letter.

Post Four is not in the least bit confusing!

Scrapit

pogofish said:

Scrapit said:

In this case I wouldnt even read the confusing newbies thread, just ignore the letter.

Post Four is not in the least bit confusing!

Then why do people repeatedly and constantly say it is? And its umpteen more times more confusing than the two word phrase "ignore it".

KeithP

@Scrapit, why do your posts never add anything useful?

Scrapit

KeithP said:

@Scrapit, why do your posts never add anything useful?

The advice "ignore it" is very relevant and entirely useful to this situation. Absolutely.
Ironically, your post Keith aint added nuffink, has it? At all.

beamerguy

Scrapit said:

KeithP said:

@Scrapit, why do your posts never add anything useful?

The advice "ignore it" is very relevant and entirely useful to this situation. Absolutely.
Ironically, your post Keith aint added nuffink, has it? At all.

Why do you mock members on here ?????

Scrapit

beamerguy said:

Scrapit said:

KeithP said:

@Scrapit, why do your posts never add anything useful?

The advice "ignore it" is very relevant and entirely useful to this situation. Absolutely.
Ironically, your post Keith aint added nuffink, has it? At all.

Why do you mock members on here ?????

I'm mocking keiths attempt at trolling by pointing out the fact I've helped, he hasn't. That seems more than fair. Also why the excess question marks?

pogofish

Scrapit said:

KeithP said:

@Scrapit, why do your posts never add anything useful?

The advice "ignore it" is very relevant and entirely useful to this situation. Absolutely.
Ironically, your post Keith aint added nuffink, has it? At all.

Except that post four fully explains just why you ignore it and in the correct context.

This board is however littered with examples of people who took “ignore” out of context at other stages of the process or who only read pre-POFA 2012 guidance/certain misleading threads and are now looking at a less fortunate outcome, or much harder work at mounting a challenge.

Which is why any advice to ignore needs to be properly qualified.

beamerguy

Scrapit said:

beamerguy said:

Scrapit said:

KeithP said:

@Scrapit, why do your posts never add anything useful?

The advice "ignore it" is very relevant and entirely useful to this situation. Absolutely.
Ironically, your post Keith aint added nuffink, has it? At all.

Why do you mock members on here ?????

I'm mocking keiths attempt at trolling by pointing out the fact I've helped, he hasn't. That seems more than fair. Also why the excess question marks?

Keith does not troll, his advice is sound and he is a very valuable member of this forum.
On the subject of trolling, I assume you have not read the FAQ's, there is a suitable section about trolling 

Scrapit

beamerguy said:

Scrapit said:

beamerguy said:

Scrapit said:

KeithP said:

@Scrapit, why do your posts never add anything useful?

The advice "ignore it" is very relevant and entirely useful to this situation. Absolutely.
Ironically, your post Keith aint added nuffink, has it? At all.

Why do you mock members on here ?????

I'm mocking keiths attempt at trolling by pointing out the fact I've helped, he hasn't. That seems more than fair. Also why the excess question marks?

Keith does not troll, his advice is sound and he is a very valuable member of this forum.
On the subject of trolling, I assume you have not read the FAQ's, there is a suitable section about trolling 

What are you sayin, the advice to ignore is incorrect? I think you'll find its wholly, absolutely and completely correct.
Also, why do you think I need referring to the faq's?My questions are not frequently asked, they are usually of a poster, such as this one.

Scrapit

pogofish said:

Scrapit said:

KeithP said:

@Scrapit, why do your posts never add anything useful?

The advice "ignore it" is very relevant and entirely useful to this situation. Absolutely.
Ironically, your post Keith aint added nuffink, has it? At all.

Except that post four fully explains just why you ignore it and in the correct context.

This board is however littered with examples of people who took “ignore” out of context at other stages of the process or who only read pre-POFA 2012 guidance/certain misleading threads and are now looking at a less fortunate outcome, or much harder work at mounting a challenge.

Which is why any advice to ignore needs to be properly qualified.

Parking fines shouldn't be ignored, but previously they could be. Hence the confusion.
This case is a foreign traffic fine that has been sold to a debt collector for a pittance in the hope that someone pays it. None of that is relevant, only two words are: ignore it.