We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Leaseholder extension clause?
Options

proformance
Posts: 345 Forumite


Hi guys,
I was told by a friend (how every good story starts) that I should look out for a clause in leasehold contracts that state that despite outside land (garden side & rear) being demised to the property for which you're the leaseholder of, the freeholder can still demand money (on top of approval) to any proposed side-return/rear extensions.
Apparently there's something explicit in the lease that allows the freeholder to exercise this right.
Can anyone refute or expand on this?
Thanks,
N
I was told by a friend (how every good story starts) that I should look out for a clause in leasehold contracts that state that despite outside land (garden side & rear) being demised to the property for which you're the leaseholder of, the freeholder can still demand money (on top of approval) to any proposed side-return/rear extensions.
Apparently there's something explicit in the lease that allows the freeholder to exercise this right.
Can anyone refute or expand on this?
Thanks,
N
0
Comments
-
Goodprinceofpounds said:
It states within:
"The “demised premises” is what is included in the leaseholder`s ownership under the terms of the lease. There is usually a definition of this in the lease and this will often be the interior of the flat including the surface of the interior walls and up to the ceiling above and joists below. It will not usually include the structural, external walls or roof, although each lease should be checked for the precise details. For example, a loft space may sometimes be included in the demised premises, sometimes not."
In the title deed from LR, it appears that the "red" etched boundary denotes what is demised (included in the lease) and it DOES include the external garden space (side and rear).
If this it's the case, it should be a straightforward request for approval from the freeholder and they cannot fairly charge any fees beyond any legal, or building consultation costs?
That sound about right?
Thanks,
N0 -
Insufficient information to tell (by long way!)
Is this a flat or a house?
Looking at the title plan is insufficent for understanding the demise. There will be lots of text in the deeds that relate to this, particularly if it's a flat. We can't see that text, and only have your vague description of it.
We also can't see any clause relating to extensions.
By the way, you can phone lease-advice.org to discuss things on the phone. It's government-funded.0 -
Your question is specific and unusual - it's not specifically addressed in the linked article.
It sounds like you're saying that your lease specifically allows the freeholder to charge a premium for consenting to an extension within the demised premises.
It's probably worth asking LEASE for an opinion on whether that is enforceable: https://clients.lease-advice.org/Appointment/Appointment?isFireSafety=False0 -
I haven't seen the lease. In fact, I don't even know where you can find the lease for a property you don't own? The only thing I could find was the leasehold "title" from LR's website, which shows the boundaries of the property in question.
My question is to try and understand what information I can refer to before instructing solicitors etc to find out if there is anything written that either a) the freeholder prohibits any extensions and/or b) the freeholder can charge us fees for extending the property (e.g. side return).
If the latter; what kind of fees and how much is this likely to cost?
Can the other leaseholder have a say also?
Side note: The freeholder is a social housing company called "Notting Hill Genesis"0 -
It's difficult to give hypothetical answers to hypothetical questions - it's better to check the lease, then ask specific questions. (Alternatively, the article linked to above gives a good overview.)
If you want to know more about the lease before making an offer, it's best to ask the seller - they might even have a copy of it.
You could also try asking the freeholder - TBH most freeholders wouldn't discuss anything with you, but occasionally I've found that social housing landlords to be a bit more open.
Failing that, order a copy of the lease from Land Registry for £7 using Form OC2 - but it will take a while to arrive.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards