PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

LL who do not accept those on benefits

Options
Hi


I am interested to start a thread and also hear from those LLs who actively either state they do not wish to rent to those in receipt of benefit or those who would not allow it anyway.

What exactly is the issue, besides LLs own personal dislike, as far as I can tell?

I say this because, I have witnessed and heard much evidence that A) Could be a Solicitor and not ever pay on time or even miss various rental payments. 
But B) Someone in receipt of benefit will pay on time, never late.

Is it because you LLs dislike the T sitting around in the property they've paid to rent longer than someone say working 9-5 would otherwise?

It cannot be used as excuse its because of the mortgage providers terms as I've seen the terms of some of the big players and they have long removed the exclude terms.

Given unemployment will likely hit a record high by the end of the year, I think it's not only morally wrong and unfair but also very discriminatory to cut someone out of a rental because of the position they may find themselves in.

Examples, cancer patient, sick and ill people, single mothers, those fleeing violence or some other type of abuse are to name a few.

If someone has the rent, can provide the deposit and have the correct documents to prove right to rent, what is your issue?
Bringing a personal exclude to these people is wrong, morally let alone following the recent landmark case.


To all the decent LLs who do not, thank you so much as its you who stop many going homeless.

To all the LLs who do, I seriously think you need to question your morals as a human being considering anyone could end up on benefits now given the current situation globally.


«1

Comments

  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,633 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 19 July 2020 at 6:17PM
    There is already a similar thread ...
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6168658/no-dss-unlawful#latest

    Some of the issues have been ..
       Some mortgage companies don't allow benefit tenants.
       Some insurers don't allow benefit tenants.
       In the event of non payment of rent it is harder to evict because Councils actively encourage benefit tenants to wait out for the bailiffs.
       In the event of non payment it is harder to recover debt as benefit tenants generally have fewer assets/funds.
       Some properties would be unaffordable for benefit tenants and the L may simply be wishing for those not to waste everyone's time by applying.

  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,686 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Insurance may be an issue, but Landlord can simply buy a policy that does permit it, perhaps a little more expensive.

    I've ignored mortgage conditions since 2000.  Doubt it would stand up in court if lender tried repo.

    MOST UK adults are in receipt of at least one benefit, increased even more with covid.

    About a million people in work get some of HB or housing element of UC.

    Reducing your size of market is normally unwise.

    Artful: in receipt of 6 benefits (old) thank you you generous taxpayers, Landlord since 2000.
  • I understand that it is now not lawful to exclude via advertisement tenants who are in receipt of benefits. This being the case it seems somewhat irrelevant to canvass opinions of landlords who might break the rules when in reality their views should not be entertained and they should simply be compelled to comply with the law.
  • Morglin
    Morglin Posts: 15,922 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    After a Court case a while ago, where a would be renter was awarded compensation, it  seems taking a blanket stand against those on benefits can be classed, by the courts, as illegal discrimination.

    https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn07008/
    You can tell a lot about a woman by her hands..........for instance, if they are placed around your throat, she's probably slightly upset. ;)
  • unforeseen
    unforeseen Posts: 7,380 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Morglin said:
    After a Court case a while ago, where a would be renter was awarded compensation, it  seems taking a blanket stand against those on benefits can be classed, by the courts, as illegal discrimination.

    https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn07008/
    I wonder if there is some tenuous link between the change in the law and cases like above.? 
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The reason is simple. The length of time it takes for the court to evict tenants. A tenants on benefits has little to lose waiting to be evicted by the court paying no rent. It leads to what they want in the first place, a social housing house. Even when they are evicted and owe months of rent, they don't have the money to go after them.

    I have a nice home in a nice area that attracts professionals. If they stop paying rent, I am much more likely to recoup it.

    Its all down to risk pure and simple. Most insurances refuse people in benefits because evidence is that they are much more of a financial risk. 

    It is massive unfair to those who are reliable tenants. Totally accept that, but I'm not interested in being a social landlord and sadly I need to lower the risks, financially of course but also in terms of potential stress. I work FT in a demanding job and although I accept that being a LL comes with an element of stress, my aim is to limit it as much as possible.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,474 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    In today's covid 19 environment, the safer tenants may be those where housing benefit is paying the rent. Also if you can find a good "hb" tenant you won't have to worry about voids between tenancies as they tend to want to make it their home for many years, particularly if they find a decent landlord.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Covid won't last forever. Also, almost impossible to ascertain who is a 'good' hb tenant. I let to a family on hb. I met them first, got references, they appeared very reasonable people. Sadly they were not, trashed the place, didn't pay last month's of rent, and later appeared they were engaged in illegal activity. 

    It comes down to risk, you can't judge anyone be they on benefits, or on a very high income, but between the two, the latter is less likely to cause issues.
  • ashe
    ashe Posts: 1,574 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Isnt part of the issue that rent goes to tenants and not the LL, so a tenant getting benefits isn’t any more likely to lag up because it’s a guaranteed benefit as they still have to manually give the LL the cash, which is proving to be a temptation to many? Plus the reasons stated above.

    wont be hard for LL’s to pick another tenant and justify it using some other criteria 
  • diggingdude
    diggingdude Posts: 2,492 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    It doesn't help that over the years many benefit tenants has behaved so disgracefully that they have tarnished the majority with the same brush and that leads to landlords fearing taking then on incase they end up with a channel 5 tenant 
    An answer isn't spam just because you don't like it......
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.