
Try this one.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
That's very similar to how I name my payees. Instead of numbering the accounts with a bank, I use the last 4 digits of the account, e.g. C HFX 1234, C HFX 6789, C HSBC 4567, C Virgin 9876, C Virgin 4321, C Coop 8866 and so on. I do it this way with all banks and building societies, and there has never been an issue with any of them, before or after the implementation of the name check.soulsaver said:So I name my Santander payees soulsaver MnS; soulsaver vm1; soulsaver vm2; soulsaver hfx1; soulsaver hfx2; soulsaver vm3 etc. & for the n or so accounts I have in my name from my Santander hub...
I guess others do similar?
They really won't sulk, they don't care one way or the other! The purpose of Confirmation of Payee is to pass the responsibility for scam payments back onto the customer - without CoP, banks have been liable to reimburse these but now that they can say that customers ignored warnings and that lets them off the hook, so how customers choose to respond to the warnings is of no interest to the banks at all....Deleted_User said:Santander will sulk that they can't match the account holder's name through their new system. But it's tough luck to them as I will ignore the system and continue with my previous method of identifying my various accounts until they wake up and fix their system.
Banks have never matched on name in the past - just ac number & sort code, so you could shorten your name as necessary to include enough characters to identify the payee.Deleted_User said:soulsaver said:So I name my Santander payees soulsaver MnS; soulsaver vm1; soulsaver vm2; soulsaver hfx1; soulsaver hfx2; soulsaver vm3 etc. & for the n or so accounts I have in my name from my Santander hub...
I guess others do similar?When typing in the payee name, Santander doesn't bother to tell you that the number of characters they will actually show on the payee list is limited (to 16 I think). So, unless you've got a very short name, you may be out of luck after having typed in the whole story and then find out the hard way later that the remaining identification is either cut short or missing altogether. So currently I'm ignoring their useless "exact account name" system and creating payees the way I did in the past which is of the form:Bank name / account nameSantander will sulk that they can't match the account holder's name through their new system. But it's tough luck to them as I will ignore the system and continue with my previous method of identifying my various accounts until they wake up and fix their system.
Well, relative to this discussion it wouldn't matter... it'd still be your account.Deleted_User said:So what if your payment goes to the wrong account and the bank says "It's your fault for failing to supply the account name and therefore we're not going to assist in recovering your loss"?colsten said:Deleted_User said:The bad news is that some financial institutions (eg Santander Bank) have made this a nightmare for customers like myself.
I consider it a minor nuisance rather than a nightmare, as you can still use whatever name you like. You just have to ignore the warning about the mismatch, and confirm that any payment is entirely your responsibility.
It's been your fault anyway for the last umpteen years, and you wouldn't have got your money back from the bank if you mis-typed your own account details. More likely than not your money transfer would have bounced and got returned a few days later as it isn't actually easy to guess valid account numbers. The CoP has not been implemented to save people from mis-typing sort codes and account numbers, but to save the gullible ones from sending money to fraudsters.Deleted_User said:So what if your payment goes to the wrong account and the bank says "It's your fault for failing to supply the account name and therefore we're not going to assist in recovering your loss"?colsten said:Deleted_User said:The bad news is that some financial institutions (eg Santander Bank) have made this a nightmare for customers like myself.
I consider it a minor nuisance rather than a nightmare, as you can still use whatever name you like. You just have to ignore the warning about the mismatch, and confirm that any payment is entirely your responsibility.