PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying out shares of a property

Options
2»

Comments

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    GDB2222 said:
    You are effectively buying a property with a tenant aged 55 who will pay no rent for the rest of her life. That’s called a reversionary interest that you are buying. For a life tenant as young as 55**,the price paid by an investor for that would usually be around 40-50% of the house value.  But you are effectively paying 75%. 
    Not even that - if the market value of the property was £120k, and a 25% share is going to be £30k, then that's 100% of market value.

    And I doubt the other relatives are going to be happy with accepting £15k for their quarter of a £120k property...

    Don't forget, too, that the aunt won't get HB or other benefits for a tenancy in a property that's owned by a relative, especially where she's gifted her own portion of the ownership away.

  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,258 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I’m not sure I understand your figures Adrian. The OP has already said the aunt will pay no rent.

    The 75% of the house not owned by the aunt is worth £90,000, once it is vacant. Assuming the OP is prepared to raise £60,000, to pay for the 75% of the house, that means persuading the other three owners to accept £20,000 each instead of £30,000.

    It’s possible that they will accept that in order to bring in some money from their inheritance and not leave the aunt homeless. Bear in mind that there’s scope for a ruinously expensive court case about this, if they try to turf the aunt out, so there’s an incentive to settle for less than the full £30,000.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.