We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Thoughts on my Asset allocation and financial position
Options
Comments
-
lescarp88 said:AFAIK, Vanguard Lifestrategy funds do include a small allocation to REITs (I think some FTSE250 property stocks). Holding ishares global property in addition to VLS is overweighting property shares (which may not negatively correlate to equities) rather than access to direct property.I went through a similar process of "what does VLS not include?". Ah, I'll add some of this or that, but then realised that lots of my intended IT purchases were already in the FTSE100/250 already and included in VLS.IMO, one VLS fund could form your core (and could be a suitable investment for your whole pot). Then, think about whethet you truly need any diversifiers to a VLS fund as optional extras, e.g. gold, private equity, direct property, direct infrastructure, an all-weather/wealth preservation fund.Regarding your ishares BRIC 50, perhaps consider a smaller % satellite allocation to these emerging markets.Likewise, the City of London IT (CTY) mentioned above is concentrated to UK stocks, while not diversifying from what you already hold in VLS. CTY would be more suitable for a retiree in the decummulation phase, but you're looking to accumulate.Yes thats its, im just trying to cover all bases and try to negatively correlate to VLS as you say. I think VLS80 does alot and therefore should probably hold more weighting in my portfolio, why complicate things right?I could then hold the other 2 funds i mention but at 10/15% each.
0 -
A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.
0 -
I’m now 28 and will be investing for many years to come, full time employed and contribute to company pension (now at 16K)I
Presume the portfolio you detailed is outside the pension. If so there should be some coordination between investments strategy inside and outside the pension.
0 -
Albermarle said:I’m now 28 and will be investing for many years to come, full time employed and contribute to company pension (now at 16K)I
Presume the portfolio you detailed is outside the pension. If so there should be some coordination between investments strategy inside and outside the pension.
correct, its in a S&S ISA with Charles Stanley direct. Pension is invested in Aviva my future Growth fund, quite similiar to VLS80 if i remember correctly.
0 -
krish123 said:A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.4
-
Prism said:krish123 said:A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.Prism said:krish123 said:A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.
0 -
krish123 said:Prism said:krish123 said:A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.Prism said:krish123 said:A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.0
-
krish123 said:Prism said:krish123 said:A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.Prism said:krish123 said:A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.Re looking for funds with high income rather than taking natural yield and selling enough to make up what you need, look at the overall growthWhich gives more diversity and higher income
https://www.investmentweek.co.uk/news/4014669/terry-smith-bad-news-equity-income-investors-surface0 -
krish123 said:A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.
If interest rates are low and bonds expensive, what they receive from the bond portfolio will be low as a proportion of the value of the bond portfolio. If the dividends it receives are low because many of the large companies in the index don't pay dividends (e.g. Amazon and Google) or because some companies that usually pay dividends have cut or suspended them (e.g. some banks and oil companies and covid-affected industries), the dividend income will be low as a proportion of the value of the equity portfolio. So the combination of the bond and equity income as a proportion of the overall value of the fund at a point in time, may not be very high.
The dividend yield of the fund (how much the fund pays out to investors as a proportion of its share price at the time they pay it out) would increase if they start to get more receipts from their investments without the fund value going up by the same percentage (e.g. if they start to get 20% more income and the fund has only gone up in value 10%, the yield from the fund will be higher than it was before). Likewise if the fund crashes in value because the bonds and equities it holds become less desirable based on market conditions, but income is still being received from them - because the companies don't cut their dividends and the bond issuers still keep paying their interest on time, then the ratio of income being received by the fund and passed on to its investors will be higher as a proportion of its share price. Still, while it's nice to get lots of income as a proportion of your investment value, you would not really want the yield to be going up due to the shares crashing in value, because you will be worse off overall because your shares are not very valuable.
The bottom line is that the VLS fund does not just 'decide' to increase the dividend they pay. As a UK open ended investment company, HMRC makes them pay out all the spare income that they earn and haven't spent on running costs. The yield of what they pay to you is just a function of what their holdings are paying to them, as a ratio of their own share price (which they can't control either). So, I wouldn't go thinking to yourself, 'they increased the dividend in the past, maybe they'll do it again'. The dividend will just be what it will be. If share prices are on the floor and interest rates and inflation really high, you are likely to see a higher dividend yield, but won't necessarily feel like you're getting a great return.3 -
Prism said:krish123 said:A good comment earlier mentioned is that i can convert the VLS to income units later down the line however, the yield on this investment is rather low at 1.6% i believe.
I think the other funds mentioned to give you what is not in the VLS80 is just a distraction that will add to your costs and not necessarily improve returns over the long term. If for example the BRIC ETF fell by 60% in a crash, would you be prepared to rebalance by selling some VLS80 that maybe had dropped only 30% in the crash. I think it is difficult decisions like this that make that strategy over-complicated, especially for an inexperienced investor.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards