We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Unclaimed Policy

sammyjo1979
Posts: 107 Forumite


Hi,
My husband received a letter today from a company that deals with life insurance and pensions stating that they'd been notified by DWP of my late father in laws passing and that they had traced my husband through living at your same address. My father in law passed away 13 years ago so it's all a bit of a shock. We rang the company and they said that my husband was the only one they sent a tracing letter to. Is this not odd considering his mother is still alive as is his sister (both of whom we have no contact with). They have said they'll pass the details on to the relevant department and will be in touch.
Any advice would be gratefully appreciated. Thank you.
My husband received a letter today from a company that deals with life insurance and pensions stating that they'd been notified by DWP of my late father in laws passing and that they had traced my husband through living at your same address. My father in law passed away 13 years ago so it's all a bit of a shock. We rang the company and they said that my husband was the only one they sent a tracing letter to. Is this not odd considering his mother is still alive as is his sister (both of whom we have no contact with). They have said they'll pass the details on to the relevant department and will be in touch.
Any advice would be gratefully appreciated. Thank you.
0
Comments
-
Not so unusual - the LGPS for one uses (expensive!) tracing services to track down pension fund members who have reached payment age/75, or nok in the event that the initial DWP search revealed that they had died. They found your husband from the address (and same name?) link and that's deemed to be sufficient.
The onus is then on the person contacted to be honest, and to inform the insurance/pension company of other potential beneficiaries - even if they are no longer in touch.
Note that if your husband's parents were married at the time of his father's death, then the most likely outcome would be that any monies due would go to his mother.1 -
-
Silvertabby said:Not so unusual - the LGPS for one uses (expensive!) tracing services to track down pension fund members who have reached payment age/75, or nok in the event that the initial DWP search revealed that they had died. They found your husband from the address (and same name?) link and that's deemed to be sufficient.
The onus is then on the person contacted to be honest, and to inform the insurance/pension company of other potential beneficiaries - even if they are no longer in touch.
Note that if your husband's parents were married at the time of his father's death, then the most likely outcome would be that any monies due would go to his mother.
We'll wait and see what they say.2 -
sammyjo1979 said:Silvertabby said:Not so unusual - the LGPS for one uses (expensive!) tracing services to track down pension fund members who have reached payment age/75, or nok in the event that the initial DWP search revealed that they had died. They found your husband from the address (and same name?) link and that's deemed to be sufficient.
The onus is then on the person contacted to be honest, and to inform the insurance/pension company of other potential beneficiaries - even if they are no longer in touch.
Note that if your husband's parents were married at the time of his father's death, then the most likely outcome would be that any monies due would go to his mother.
We'll wait and see what they say.
0 -
Hi, so, the company advised us that the policy would need to go to the next of kin as there were no named parties on the policy itself. We notified my husbands mother who has since refused to provide them with the will. We have a strong feeling that there is something written in the will that states my husband and his sibling are the beneficiaries hence her not willing to provide them with it. The Company have said that the money will just sit there until she provides a will. Is this not odd that she will not provide the will? Anyone come across this before? Thanks0
-
1
-
xylophone said:0
-
sammyjo1979 said:Hi, so, the company advised us that the policy would need to go to the next of kin as there were no named parties on the policy itself. We notified my husbands mother who has since refused to provide them with the will. We have a strong feeling that there is something written in the will that states my husband and his sibling are the beneficiaries hence her not willing to provide them with it. The Company have said that the money will just sit there until she provides a will. Is this not odd that she will not provide the will? Anyone come across this before? Thanks1
-
-
poppystar said:sammyjo1979 said:Hi, so, the company advised us that the policy would need to go to the next of kin as there were no named parties on the policy itself. We notified my husbands mother who has since refused to provide them with the will. We have a strong feeling that there is something written in the will that states my husband and his sibling are the beneficiaries hence her not willing to provide them with it. The Company have said that the money will just sit there until she provides a will. Is this not odd that she will not provide the will? Anyone come across this before? Thanks0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards