PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying a house with inlaws

Options
2

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    davidmcn said:
    i was probably most worried what would happen if one or both parents need nursing home care? Would that threaten our family home?
    Depends how you expect it to be paid for.
    Well I believe if a single person or couple, with assets (in this case a house) requires nursing care then they have to sell the house to fund the care.  But if one spouse requires nursing care but the other spouse is still living in the house then the council funds the care and the spouse can continue living in the house.

    in my scenario both inlaws and my family will be living in the house, so if one or both parents require nursing care in the future, will the funding of that force my family to have to sell up and move out?
    Will they need their care to be subsidised by public funds? We don't know how much money your in-laws have got, other than their current house is mortgage-free. It sounds like you'll have a reasonable amount of equity in the new house if you needed to release more funds by remortgaging. Though I think in practice if the local authority is providing funds then they'll put a charge on the property and await payment whenever that becomes possible, they don't literally kick you out.
  • greatcrested
    greatcrested Posts: 5,925 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There is also a get out if the house is also the main residence of another family member over the age of 60.

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 7 June 2020 at 10:37PM
    i could see the bit about if one spouse needs care and one is still living in the house, but couldn't see anything about other family living in the house with a share of that house.
    The last thing I want to happen is that I have to lose my family home.
    As my newty friend says, the cut-off is age 60.

    Below that age, TPTB assume that you can stand on your own two feet financially, and your parents can pay for their own care, rather than have the council tax payers of the area subsidise your inheritance...
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 8 June 2020 at 5:35AM
    Surely lots of Asian families do this?
    They do. It's a responsibility taken seriously and discussed by the children, even in today's Britain. Not understanding why or why not is a cultural thing.
    Must admit, at one time I considered a shared larger property like this too, as we had plenty of equity between us at the time. Glad I didn't now, though!


  • wilfred30
    wilfred30 Posts: 878 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Does your wife have any siblings who would be disadvantaged by this proposed arrangement?
  • Mickey666
    Mickey666 Posts: 2,834 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 8 June 2020 at 10:54AM
    Much depends on the family dynamics.  Another option would be for the in-laws to sell their house and gift the money to the OP couple who then sell their own home and use the pool of funds to buy a new house suitable for all of them, preferably with a elf-contained annexe for the in-laws.  In fact, if it’s a self-contained annexe it can have its own council tax band (often reducing the CT band on the rest of the house).  The annexe CT would then attract 100% discount by being occupied by ‘dependent relatives’ if they’re over 60.
    Another option is for the new house to be bought by the OP couple and the in-laws pay rent to fund the mortgage, assuming the OP couple could get a mortgage in their own right.  Or perhaps some sort of gift + rent arrangement might work.
    There are pros and cons for any arrangement but these suggestions would avoid the complications of multiple ownership.
    Also, consider what ‘living together’ will mean in practice.  A self-contained annexe in a large house is one thing, a separate bedroom and sharing everything else is quite another.
    As I said, family dynamics will make or break this sort of thing.
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Didn't live it it, but did something similar. As long as the working parties could cover the mortgage themselves, the lenders were happy for the non-working parties to be listed on the mortgage and as co-owners (their contribution came from cash equity).
  • onwards&upwards
    onwards&upwards Posts: 3,423 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Would would be far more sensible for them to just move very close to you, or you to them.  Same street or round the corner.  Then you can help out without getting hopelessly financially entangled.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,623 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Have you discussed  the plan with a mortgage broker to see if he can come up with a lender who will consider a mortgage in these circumstances?

    You can own the property as tenants-in-common with a Deed of Trust specifying the beneficial shares.

    If one parent needs to go into care,  the house will be disregarded in any financial assessment - if both, then you might have to consider remortgaging in order to cover their fees.

    Of course, neither of them might ever need residential care - you might be well advised to take the needs of an elderly frail person into account when choosing your new property - suitable bath/shower room/ room for wheelchair access etc.







  • tarzanette
    tarzanette Posts: 26 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Mickey666 said: a elf-contained annexe assuming the OP 
    Poor Dobby. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.