We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
VW deisel scandal, too late to claim?
Comments
-
It sounds like punitive damages to me based on what, I don't know as I haven't read the full judgement. Whatever rules/laws are in place the courts (of any country) can interpret them as they see fit.sheramber said:
If they didn't breach any European rules- as you claim- then why are they having to buy back the car?AdrianC said:
Did you actually bother to read that?sheramber said:
The German courts do not agree with youAdrianC said:The only extant court case has long since closed to new claimants. Nobody knows whether they will win.
Other organisations may well be offering the opportunity to be part of other claim groups. Nobody knows whether they will get anywhere, even if the main claim wins.
None of Mojo's claimed losses are even remotely tangible, and they are certainly not legally enforceable in any normal circumstance. There is no evidence that VAG breached the rules on the applicable European tests. They were found to have breached the (very different, and far stricter) US tests, but they're not relevant to UK claims.
https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/volkswagen-buy-dieselgate-cars-germany-top-court-200525061920051.html
The German courts (who have no jurisdiction in the UK) amended a previous ruling, in which a court had ordered VW to buy a vehicle back, but allowed for depreciation - to disregard the depreciation.0 -
KimJongUn88 said:
In that case anyone who has breathed the air in the country that a VAG vehicle has been driven can bring a claim?[DELETED USER] said:
The loss, for those wondering, is loss of value, possible increased maintenance costs (extra urea used etc.) and increased health costs due to excessive dangerous emissions.
It will be hard to show what amount they contributed to health damage, that's the problem. If you own one it's different.
I'd wait to see what the outcome of the current legal action is, if they win you can use that to make your own claims or join one of the other ones that will inevitably start.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards