Sunday Times Article - One Parking Solution

BrownTrout

JB111 said:

Paragraph 101 of the Judgment of HHJ Simpkiss (dated the 1 February 2021) makes a finding that DDJ Harvey was bias. Furthermore, permission has also been granted on another case DDJ Harvey has adjudicated upon surrounding biasness. This has nothing to do with being a case that 'benefits' but more so a simple update. It has no bearing on future cases as this Judge has now retired.

Jake then answer this why do you never discuss the cases that you lose ? you seem to only pop on threads like this

Redx

BrownTrout said:

JB111 said:

Paragraph 101 of the Judgment of HHJ Simpkiss (dated the 1 February 2021) makes a finding that DDJ Harvey was bias. Furthermore, permission has also been granted on another case DDJ Harvey has adjudicated upon surrounding biasness. This has nothing to do with being a case that 'benefits' but more so a simple update. It has no bearing on future cases as this Judge has now retired.

Jake then answer this why do you never discuss the cases that you lose ? you seem to only pop on threads like this

I think it's more bias !!!  😜😜😜

beamerguy

BrownTrout said:

JB111 said:

Paragraph 101 of the Judgment of HHJ Simpkiss (dated the 1 February 2021) makes a finding that DDJ Harvey was bias. Furthermore, permission has also been granted on another case DDJ Harvey has adjudicated upon surrounding biasness. This has nothing to do with being a case that 'benefits' but more so a simple update. It has no bearing on future cases as this Judge has now retired.

Jake then answer this why do you never discuss the cases that you lose ? you seem to only pop on threads like this

Is there any good reason why JB sends Humpty Dumpty bods to court ?

BrownTrout

beamerguy said:

BrownTrout said:

JB111 said:

Paragraph 101 of the Judgment of HHJ Simpkiss (dated the 1 February 2021) makes a finding that DDJ Harvey was bias. Furthermore, permission has also been granted on another case DDJ Harvey has adjudicated upon surrounding biasness. This has nothing to do with being a case that 'benefits' but more so a simple update. It has no bearing on future cases as this Judge has now retired.

Jake then answer this why do you never discuss the cases that you lose ? you seem to only pop on threads like this

Is there any good reason why JB sends Humpty Dumpty bods to court ?

Parking companies in general use 3 main law firms , like elms, lpc and another one which i cant think the name of , these fims have lots of self employed advocates who dont earn a lot and are pretty much on the bottom of the ladder law wise
They do lots of different cases in the county ranging from parking tickets to people suing builders , they dont tend to do family law cases as these are more specialist
this is not just parking companies lots of firms that do low value high volume litigation do this

beamerguy

BrownTrout said:

beamerguy said:

BrownTrout said:

JB111 said:

Paragraph 101 of the Judgment of HHJ Simpkiss (dated the 1 February 2021) makes a finding that DDJ Harvey was bias. Furthermore, permission has also been granted on another case DDJ Harvey has adjudicated upon surrounding biasness. This has nothing to do with being a case that 'benefits' but more so a simple update. It has no bearing on future cases as this Judge has now retired.

Jake then answer this why do you never discuss the cases that you lose ? you seem to only pop on threads like this

Is there any good reason why JB sends Humpty Dumpty bods to court ?

Parking companies in general use 3 main law firms , like elms, lpc and another one which i cant think the name of , these fims have lots of self employed advocates who dont earn a lot and are pretty much on the bottom of the ladder law wise
They do lots of different cases in the county ranging from parking tickets to people suing builders , they dont tend to do family law cases as these are more specialist
this is not just parking companies lots of firms that do low value high volume litigation do this

I know all that ...... my question was tongue in cheek 

Snakes_Belly

It must be very difficult for a judge when they know that the actions of the PPC's are morally wrong. This must be especially difficult for a judge like Mark Harvey who appears to have strong religious convictions. He must be diametrically opposite of the owners of the PPC's for whom mammon is their god.

JB111

Snakes_Belly said:

Redx said:

Those are the cases Joke never comments on , which seems to be the vast majority of cases IMHO !!

Notice that it's the cannon fodder that have put their head above the parapet in these hearings. JB never shows his face even in the Sheffield hearings.  

I have been an advocate of the Court for 11 years now dealing with mortgage repossession, landlord & tenant, charging orders and small claims parking matters. Unfortunately, I cannot be in every Court at once (also due to other work commitments) and you are welcome to ask bargepole whether I show my face in hearings. I am sure he will endorse me. Therefore, your statement is factually incorrect.

JB111

BrownTrout said:

JB111 said:

Paragraph 101 of the Judgment of HHJ Simpkiss (dated the 1 February 2021) makes a finding that DDJ Harvey was bias. Furthermore, permission has also been granted on another case DDJ Harvey has adjudicated upon surrounding biasness. This has nothing to do with being a case that 'benefits' but more so a simple update. It has no bearing on future cases as this Judge has now retired.

Jake then answer this why do you never discuss the cases that you lose ? you seem to only pop on threads like this

I have had this conversation with another forumite. I am happy to do so moving forward. The purpose of my comments are to add constructive dialogue. If forumites are respectful then I will gladly answer/assist as and when I can. I am in no way 'gloating' as many people suggest. I am just merely making a factual correction. Unfortunately, DDJ Harvey was found to be bias and as such some of his orders are in the process of being overturned.

D_P_Dance

Therefore, your statement is factually incorrect.

Which statement , the quotes on here confuse one. 

Snakes_Belly

"Unfortunately, DDJ Harvey was found to be bias and as such some of his orders are in the process of being overturned."

I would not call it bias, I would call it having a moral compass.