BW Legal sending letters but I've recently relocated overseas - do I still need to reply?

Jenni_D

That reads more like a defence than a WS ... a WS would be the story and would introduce evidence.

The closing statement is also wrong - the required wording was changed more than a year ago.

Johnersh

As I see it, the o/p is due to serve his defence since the Claimant has never actually served proceedings on him.

If the documents were sent tracked post as directed, the claimant will be able to prove dispatch. They were also instructed to email.

I don't see how a defence can properly be filed if the court proceedings haven't been served. Unless they were supplied in the course of the set aside hearing.

If that presumption is correct, it's simply a case of the o/p determining the correct time to write to the court/apply to the court and to seek the strike out for want of service (again).

It's a long way off witness statements, isn't it? But that depends what was discussed at the hearing.