Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
I have gone to the press!
Comments
-
IF there is a valid reason is the key point. The IPC is not fit to be an accredited trade association.My scammers requested over 1,200 motorists’ details without landlord authority and claiming to use mobile ANPR which Mr Will Hurley stated last week he has no idea what it is - following my police report to him that a man on site with a camera, is not mobile ANPR(A = automatic, little or no human involvement). My car was parked right up against a Cornish hedge and the scammer somehow got behind it for a rear photo - quite impressive really but worrying the lengths someone will go to for £60.5
-
I like what the OP is doing.beamerguy said:
Here is a letter sent to Moneyonline, part of the Daily Mail, more so the great Gladstones IPC scam
This is not about the DVLA but the scam which allows them access to the DVLA
But this letter beamerguy, it really explains why referring to the PPCs as scammers is entirely accurate. Somewhere in Point 4 it loses clarity somewhat ... well to my mind it does. I'd like to see that letter improved a bit and bandied about.2 -
This is not about the DVLA but the scam which allows them access to the DVLAI disagree. The DVLA is ultimately at fault as it is failing in its duty to regulate its own ATAs. It has consistently ignored all the evidence provided about the IPC/Gladstones conflict of interest and allowed the scam to continue.3
-
The DVLA know that for every £2.50 they collect there will be a fellow human being about to suffer shock, trauma, harassment and intimidation and the strong possibility that it will cost the majority £100 each. Morally bankrupt! The misery they are at the root of is a national disgrace.
EDIT TO ADD - just changed the word 'motorist' to read 'fellow human being' as the former is too inanimate to fully express this.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street6 -
This is one of those posts I would like to thank 100 times! ZhongUmkomaas said:The DVLA know that for every £2.50 they collect there will be a motorist about to suffer shock, trauma, harassment and intimidation and the strong possibility that it will cost the majority £100 each. Morally bankrupt! The misery they are at the root of is a national disgrace.3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179.1K Life & Family
- 263.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
