I have gone to the press!

zhonguonuren

Ongoing press contact.  Will update when possible.  

zhonguonuren

I apologise - the Daily Mail is obsessed with house prices

beamerguy

I fail to see the point of your letter talking about your assets ????

Here is a letter sent to Moneyonline, part of the Daily Mail, more so the great Gladstones IPC scam 

This is not about the DVLA but the scam which allows them access to the DVLA

Here is a copy of the email, HOW THE SCAM WORKS ....

Dear Sirs,

Further to your article regarding private parking companies.

I am unsure if you understand the huge scam that operates

in this business.

You mentioned the International Parking community known

as the IPC.

The IPC was set up by Gladstones solicitors

https://www.gladstonessolicitors.co.uk/

The IPC in turn set up the IAS which claims to be an

independent assessor similar to POPLA but in reality,

it is a method of rejecting appeals on behalf of the IPC

members. 

The members of the IPC were members of the BPA but

were lured into the scam of the IPC because they knew

that the vast majority of appeals against them will be

rejected

HOW THE IPC SCAM WORKS:

1: The motorist gets a parking ticket

2: They appeal to the parking company which is rejected

3: They are then given the opportunity to appeal to the IAS

which is also rejected

4: Shortly thereafter, the motorist receives a letter from

a debt collector, normally DRP, who add £60 automatically

and threatening to take people to court ?

As you probably know, debt collectors involved in the

parking scam have no power and cannot take people

to court.  At this stage, due to scare tactics, many people

will pay, mainly because the fear of a CCJ.

Whilst it is advised that debt collectors like DRP must be

ignored as they are powerless .... after a while it is passed

back to the PPC ....... the £60 is passed back as well, despite

DRP claiming they "act on a no win no fee" basis

http://www.debtrecoveryplus.co.uk/pcn-collection/

If the motorist has ignored DRP, then there is no charge

to the PPC but still the £60 is added and passed on

The final part of the scam is that Gladstones solicitors

are instructed and then take the motorist to court and

adding on the DRP scam £60

The Gladstones scam goes in a full circle ??? A SCAM

zhonguonuren

With all due respect - we’ll see 

beamerguy

While you are doing this, ask the Mail if they have followed up on this article

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3786132/I-ll-end-credit-rating-scandal-pledges-PM-acts-Mail-exposes-rulings-ruined-lives.html

zhonguonuren

So you think I may have a voice ? 

zhonguonuren

zhonguonuren said:

So you think I may have a voice ? 

Just to be clear, I will make myself heard

Coupon-mad

I think you will!  And I saw the joke about the house price. 

Can you attach a photo for them of you with a happy face, holding the judgment about the DVLA case you won?

Do you mind if I send you a pm at some point as I think your case might add something to a complaint I plan to make and maybe we can liaise on it?  

zhonguonuren

Absolutely pm me.  I have just discovered how to use it!  I saw you were working on a complaint.

The house price is crass but I wanted it to stand out somehow.  It might be picked up by the DM on a slow news day.  

I am now tired of being polite and being ignored.  I sent this email to FOI (copying in the ICO, DVLA legal team etc) on 30th April and received an apology with the correct information the next day.  In the past I have been patient, reworded to make myself understood and then waited another 3 weeks for the response.  

I would still advise others to be polite - I might end up in jail! 

zhonguonuren

Coupon-mad said:

Can you attach a photo for them of you with a happy face, holding the judgment about the DVLA case you won?

Oh gosh I hate those but it may come to that.  This is someone who is social media phobic.  See what I am willing to do for you 🤣

D_P_Dance

As a landlord I have no objection to the DVLA relwasing RK details if there is a valid reason.  In many/most cases the PPC has a valid reason imo.  It is how the PPC then use it that is the problem.