We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Are current accounts covered by Financial Services Compensation Scheme


Comments
-
This is their leaflet and it seems pretty clear.
https://www.fscs.org.uk/globalassets/badge-assets/shared/fscs_may2019_online-leaflet.pdf
FSCS protects your deposits, whether you’re an individual or a company. A deposit is money in accounts such as current and savings accounts, including cash ISAs. If your bank, building society or credit union fails, we may be able to pay compensation.
If it's a joint account, you would be entitled to double the protection.1 -
It's a simple enough question but I can't find an unambiguous answer to this anywhere on Moneysaving Expert nor anywhere else for that matter.
It is pretty clear on the FSCS website:
https://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover/
If you hold money with a UK-authorised bank, building society or credit union that fails, we’ll automatically compensate you.
- up to £85,000 per eligible person, per bank, building society or credit union.
I even emailed the FSCA itself but they didn't even bother to reply. Maybe I'm missing something.If that isn't a type then you probably emailed the wrong place. If it is a typo then do remember that they are on lockdown and running a much reduced service.
They all use that terminology, 'eligible funds' including the FSCA, but there is never a definition of what 'eligible funds' is.Not all money in a bank is protected. If you exceed the limits or have multiple accounts that exceed the limits in total. Or you exceed the special limit (temporary high balance) or if you have a business, the structure of that business is taken into account (e.g. ltd company gives you a second FSCS allowance but sole trader or partnership doesn't).
The use of the term "eligible" is just a way of highlighting that there are caveats.
The simple bottom line is that a current account is a deposit based product.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
Just to add to the comprehensive replies above, yes, it does.2
-
Thank you Dunstonh for that very helpful reply.'The use of the term "eligible" is just a way of highlighting that there are caveats.'It's exactly those caveats that I was needing insight on. It's the FSCA's job to communicate unambiguously with savers and I like plain English with no caveats. 'Any personal money in a bank account of any kind under £85,000 per person is covered by the £85,000 guarantee' What's wrong with that?There's another ambiguity which the FSCA does not cover and which I've failed to get an answer to. I think that most savers assume that if a financial crash occurs the government will pay them their <85,000 in a lump but I suspect that won't happen and that the government will pay in instalments. Say 20% the first year and 10% every subsequent year till done. The FSCA does not mention how pay outs will occur, yet if savers knew that instalments would be likely they could build a safety-net into their financial arrangements. It is all very well for people to say 'do not worry' but if these things are not explicitly covered the result could be as difficult as for those unfortunates who trusted in Equitable Life.. "After a two-decade battle for justice, more than 160000 policyholders ... Last hope for victims of Equitable Life injustice as savers are asked to ... Policyholders will be told how the decision could affect their retirement fund"I wonder what your opinion is of this?Johnny
1 -
The Equitable Life situation was and is completely different to money held in banks.1
-
The one time the FSCS had to step up for me and repay money owed due to a collapsed financial institution it was all paid in one go, though took a few months.
0 -
Johnny4x4 said:It's the FSCA's job to communicate unambiguously with savers and I like plain English with no caveats. 'Any personal money in a bank account of any kind under £85,000 per person is covered by the £85,000 guarantee' What's wrong with that?
You are confusing the FCA (regulatory body) with the FSCS (industry-funded compensation scheme).
As for what is wrong with the statement about which you asked: that statement would not be true - there are caveats.
The potential overlap of banking licences and whether or not the organisation is actually registered with, and approved by, the FCA, for example.I am one of the Dogs of the Index.2 -
Johnny4x4 said:I think that most savers assume that if a financial crash occurs the government will pay them their <85,000 in a lump but I suspect that won't happen and that the government will pay in instalments.3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards