We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Title Deeds
Comments
-
ZP63 said:If I'm in the right can I not reclaim the legal fees that had to paid due to someone else's awkwardnessYes you can claim costs if you win. However as I said:You could go to court and request an injunction prohibiting them from ever blocking the access, but a) this may fail once the judge hears that access is being granted on request and .....
It is rare for legal action to be guaranteed to suceed. If you lose, he could claim his legal costs rom you.
0 -
By him blocking the access wether he opens up or not isn't he doing wrong full stop
Why would the fact that him giving access change anything
I mean the ideal situation would be to leave the area clear
If he wasn't being funny about it and complying I really don't have an issue with blocking it but like I said above he alwasy makes me feel like he's doing me a FAVOUR..0 -
Sorry for going on mate...its hard to find the right advice
So in essence right of way can be obstructed and blocked?
0 -
premises hereby conveyed from and to......... Road aforesaid through the gateway and over the yard of the adjoining property numbered aforesaid for the purpose of conveying ashes, refuse, coal and garden manure as heretofore used and enjoyed."
The RoW is extremely specific but does give you the right to use the path for the purposes specified. It does not say that these activities are restricted to any particular time of day. It does not say that you need to seek the permission of the owner of the path - it seems to me that he must leave the path sufficiently clear at all times to permit you to undertake all or any of the specified activities.
"Moving refuse" presumably includes moving your wheelie bin which is hardly likely to be possible if there is a vehicle in the way.
If it is impossible to undertake the specified activities while the owner's vehicles are in the way, it seems you might have a case for his wilful failure to comply with the covenant?
What does your solicitor have to say?0 -
My solicitor has already established that I have right of way and I gave it to neighbour on written form which he made an issue out of
I don't think he was happy and it wasn't something he had anticipated
The ideal situation would be that he leaves his cars there,I don't trouble him and when I need to he fully complies without making life difficult or goimg on rants0 -
Do you feel I have a strong case
He actually parks his car in a way that when I open my garden gate there is no what, whatsoever to get out,not even a small child can get through let alone a wheelie bin
Maybe I should put my bin at the back and make him move cars every week
He wants to do things at his convenience whxih surely is defeats the purpose of having right of way0 -
I no longer understand what you are expecting from us.I've already said that you could bring a legal claim that might or might not succeed. My view is that the risk of not succeeding, combined with the time, stress costs involved, make it a path to avoid.Xylophone has been more positive in his view, but no one can predict a judge's ruling.Yet you now say you have had a solicitor's advice.Best to rely on the professinal's advice you've paid for than random strangers on the internet.0
-
The ROW was written in 1925 so the fact is specific is probably according to the usage at the time
There were no cars back then so it wouldn't specify wether a car can be parked there but again common sense says he can't as it is a major obstruction0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards