PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Building/planning Issue re: our future neighbour's extension between exchange and completion

Since we exchanged contracts on our new property exactly a week ago, the current vendor has encountered an issue with the building work on the neighbour's new extension encroaching on our future property. The neighbour's architect made a 'mistake' and was 40cm out on the height of the extension, so they have built the extension 40cm taller than approved, which meant potential problems re drainage off the roof; our vendor writes  "(the neighbours) have overlapped a small section of their roof cover onto our parapet wall immediately adjacent to their property without our permission".  It seems that prior to our vendor finding out about all of this the neighbour instructed their roofer to do a workaround to deal with the issue of drainage, which has included overlapping their roof onto our future property and installing a new flashing, to supposedly ameliorate any future issues with impact of rainwater drainage causing potential damp to our future property. The vendor and the neighbour have been in lengthy correspondence over the past week to resolve this (not involving us). They have only appraised us today, and that, between them, they have come to an 'agreement' that the neighbour will be responsible for any future water damage to our new property. The 'agreement' is loosely worded and in emails, not actually any 'legal' agreement with specifics such as timescales, choice/approval of contractors etc. Considering we have 'exchanged' contracts and the vendor has entered into another 'contract' with the neighbour since then, can we (1) reject their agreement and insist on legally binding specific terms that we approve of; (2) request an independent survey report (at their expense) of the issues prior to any agreement being made; (3) request 'sight' of the building officer's approval of the revised height of their new extension, and approval of the workaround, (4) request written reasons as to why the vendors were not appraised of the issues at the time they arose, why they were not given the opportunity to approve the 'workaround', and why the neighbours saw fit to trespass and do 'work' on the vendor's property without permission (the roof of their new extension is now within the boundary of our future property). We are unable to actually visit the property to inspect any of this at present as it is much too far to travel during lockdown. I wonder if anyone can give me some sensible advice please? Thank you in advance for any advice you can offer.
«1

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Your rights are those in the contract you've exchanged - you can by all means ask (nicely) for other things over and above what you're entitled to, but you need to look to your contract first to see what your vendors are actually obliged to do.
  • Skip25
    Skip25 Posts: 7 Forumite
    First Post
    Just to be clear... if it makes any difference, the work that was done without the vendor's permission has been done since the survey, and has only been highlighted since we exchanged.
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 17 April 2020 at 4:51PM
    So, to summarise...
    You exchanged contracts on a property, but are yet to complete.
    You have been notified since exchange that a neighbour has built a slightly overhanging roof/gutter.
    Your vendor is trying to make you happy by striking an informal agreement with the neighbour around this overhang will be managed over time.
    That's a fair summary?

    Do you know if the overhang was built before or after exchange? I'm not sure you're clear on that point and it's important.

    Firstly, go and see the problem yourself if you can, and decide whether it is practically/legally something you want to fight or not. If it's a few mm of land that you don't care about, you probably don't want to get legal about it. But it sounds like that's not the case.

    Speak to your solicitor. I am sure that you are not bound by anything your neighbour agrees. The real problem you have here is one of infringement of your future boundary, not building regs or planning permission breaches by your neighbour (although you may report those as well if you like).

    The contractual issue here is going to be around the standard conditions of sale that you have agreed with your vendor. In particular Section 5, which basically states that risk for the property is transferred to you at the moment of exchange, with your vendor now occupying some kind of trustee position as titular owner, but you being the one holding the underlying beneficial interest in the property. So it may be for you to sort this out, as long as the problem really did arise after exchange and the vendor did not misrepresent - worth checking, if you can! Now I'm no expert, so I can't guarantee this is accurate, but worth looking at and discussion with your solicitor.

    Did you put your own legal cover and insurance on the property immediately after exchange?
  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,601 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Not sure about the legal standing of any emails.  However, if the height is not as the approved plans it would need to be agreed by the planning officer via and amended planning application.  It is not really a matter for building control.

    Was there a party wall agreement in place?   Any unauthorised modification to the party wall should be handled by the PW surveyors.
  • Skip25
    Skip25 Posts: 7 Forumite
    First Post
    So, to summarise...
    You exchanged contracts on a property, but are yet to complete.
    You have been notified since exchange that a neighbour has built a slightly overhanging roof/gutter.
    Your vendor is trying to make you happy by striking an informal agreement with the neighbour around this overhang will be managed over time.
    That's a fair summary?

    Do you know if the overhang was built before or after exchange? I'm not sure you're clear on that point and it's important.

    Firstly, go and see the problem yourself if you can, and decide whether it is practically/legally something you want to fight or not. If it's a few mm of land that you don't care about, you probably don't want to get legal about it. But it sounds like that's not the case.

    Speak to your solicitor. I am sure that you are not bound by anything your neighbour agrees. The real problem you have here is one of infringement of your future boundary, not building regs or planning permission breaches by your neighbour (although you may report those as well if you like).

    The contractual issue here is going to be around the standard conditions of sale that you have agreed with your vendor. In particular Section 5, which basically states that risk for the property is transferred to you at the moment of exchange, with your vendor now occupying some kind of trustee position as titular owner, but you being the one holding the underlying beneficial interest in the property. So it may be for you to sort this out, as long as the problem really did arise after exchange and the vendor did not misrepresent - worth checking, if you can! Now I'm no expert, so I can't guarantee this is accurate, but worth looking at and discussion with your solicitor.

    Did you put your own legal cover and insurance on the property immediately after exchange?
    Hi - thank you for your reply. Yes, that's a fair summary. I'm led to believe that the work they did on our vendor's side of the boundary wall (without permission) was because of concerns of water drainage from the higher than planned roof of their extension potentially causing water damage to the family room/kitchen of our future property. I don't know when that work was completed, just that it was certainly after our survey two weeks ago, it may have been before exchange though. We do wish to keep it all as civil as possible and avoid any legal wrangles, but at the same time protect our future property from any potential damage, and also ameliorate any future issues with a survey should we decide to sell.  We cannot inspect the work during lockdown as it is some considerable distance from where we are now, but will as soon as we can. I just wonder if it's worth having it inspected by a professional to ensure that any work done is actually of reliable quality.
  • Skip25
    Skip25 Posts: 7 Forumite
    First Post
    anselld said:
    Not sure about the legal standing of any emails.  However, if the height is not as the approved plans it would need to be agreed by the planning officer via and amended planning application.  It is not really a matter for building control.

    Was there a party wall agreement in place?   Any unauthorised modification to the party wall should be handled by the PW surveyors.
    Thank you for your reply. We received no notification of a party wall agreement in papers prior to exchange, and believe that there is none in place.
  • Slithery
    Slithery Posts: 6,046 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Skip25 said:
    I don't know when that work was completed, just that it was certainly after our survey two weeks ago, it may have been before exchange though.
    Did you not check the property just prior to exchange? Because that's the state that you have agreed to buy it in.
  • Skip25
    Skip25 Posts: 7 Forumite
    First Post
    Slithery said:
    Skip25 said:
    I don't know when that work was completed, just that it was certainly after our survey two weeks ago, it may have been before exchange though.
    Did you not check the property just prior to exchange? Because that's the state that you have agreed to buy it in.
    The survey was completed a week prior to exchange, a few days before lockdown.
  • Rural_Puppy
    Rural_Puppy Posts: 233 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts
    Moving home is considered a reasonable excuse to be out of your house. 
  • jaybeetoo
    jaybeetoo Posts: 1,353 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You should be talking to your solicitor (that’s what you’re paying them for) and not rely on advice from a public forum.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 597.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.