We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Sole Director / Coronavirus

2»

Comments

  • jadex
    jadex Posts: 812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 24 March 2020 at 4:01PM
    I was searching for some answers to this too as I'm in the same position. Consultancy company, sole director, only employee and pay myself a wage and a dividend. Expecting the bad news soon and was wondering how or if people like me can even be helped financially during this time. I'm sure all will be revealed soon but I'm not feeling particularly confident in truth. 
    If you (as a company) would furloughed yourself (as a Director), then you would be forbidden to do any work for your company in order to claim 80%.
    Now, that 80% would have to be claimed by a Company i.e. Director but at this time your company would be having none.
    Besides, no limited company can be "Directorless", so I'm afraid it's a no-no
  • p00hsticks
    p00hsticks Posts: 14,905 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 24 March 2020 at 4:34PM
    justwhat said:
    director Dave Originally employed / PAYE his wife,sister and daughter. 
    Correct me if i am wrong but all the  LTD has to do now is pay them 20% wage and .gov will pay the rest.  Dave is not going to pay them off even if the LTD is running at a loss.
    And surely Dave , if PAYE the .gov is going to pay him, unless they put something in place. (unless like mortgages the count him as SE)


    As I understand it (from listening to Radio 4 Moneybox) the 80% wage is going to be based on what has already been reported to HMRC as the February PAYE earnings so IF Dave was genuinely employing his wife, sister and daughter before all this happened then he could furlough them and legitimately use the job retention scheme to continue to pay them 80% of what he originally piad them in February
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,786 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    I wouldn't rely on Radio 4 Moneybox. These details have not been published. They could change. I have a feeling that those allowing entry into the coronavirus job retention scheme are going to look very carefully at companies that just employ family members. I know I would.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.