Excel Parking Claim Form - Defence for Review

Fiortdunlop2020

Just wanted to clarify I intend to email Wed 29th July midday latest, which I deem to be within the 28 days prior to the Trial Date of 26th August. Having read previous post on Covid hearing and emailing, I assume email WS and associated documentation is fine and no need to post. 
Many Thanks

Coupon-mad

Should be fine but try to keep your total pages under 50, in case you get a jobsworth clerk who thinks they are meant to print it all out, which for a telephone hearing they shouldn't need to...but you want to keep the court onside.

Fiortdunlop2020

Good Morning so in reference to the 50 pages I assume I do not need to include the previous submitted defences in the the bundle, therefore these are excluded from the 50 pages.
Many Thanks

Le_Kirk

You submit exactly what your notice requests.  In pre-covid times, you wold only have submitted WS, evidence and summary costs assessment.  With the advent of telephone hearings, defendants are sometimes asked to make up and submit a bundle consisting of absolutely everything.  Check your notice of allocation.

Fiortdunlop2020

Morning Le_Kirk
I have a hearing date in the court. The Notice of Allocation stated:
"parties must send copies of their Witness Statements and documents to the court and each other no later than 28 days before the final hearing.
Thanks

Le_Kirk

Fiortdunlop2020 said:

Morning Le_Kirk
I have a trail hearing date in the court. The Notice of Allocation stated:
"parties must send copies of their Witness Statements and documents to the court and each other no later than 28 days before the final hearing.
Thanks

If it is in court, then the court/judge/claimant should have your defence as it would have been supplied to them by CCBC.  If it is a telephone hearing, it is becoming the norm to have to submit everything again in a bundle.  I would take that letter to mean WS, evidence and summary costs assessment.  If you will be in court, you will, of course, have with you spare copies of all your paperwork, including your defence.

Coupon-mad

If the defence would take it over 50 pages then don't include that, and assume the court has it from MCOL (which is not your problem if they don't, and you can always ping it to the Judge by email on the spot - I've done that last month!).  

Fiortdunlop2020

Good Evening 
Received Excel's WS and evidence in post today dated 31/07/20. Only pertains to first claim and nothing about second claim.
Interesting Point 35: " the Defendant has raised points within the defence that are irrelevant to the claim:

• In summary the Defendant claims that the £160.00 claim exceeds the maximum sum prescribed in PoFA 2012

• The NtK does not comply with the provisions of S4 of POFA 2012".

Evidence is basically all the letters sent (NtK, Final Reminder, LBC etc)
Any comments appreciated 
Regards

Castle

You've left your name on page 2.

Fruitcake

Lots of problems with the alleged contract. The signatures do not comply with the Companies Act 2006 for a start. I'll come back to that in a bit.

Did you redact the names/signatures or did the scammers? If it was you, we need to see it unredacted except for your personal data.

The statement of truth is out of date. A paralegal should know it changed in April of this year. We have seen this sort of rubbish from Yasmeen before. She should know better.