We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Parking Charge Notice - UK Car Park Management (UK CPM) - double yellows private road.
Comments
-
For clarity only:
I use term TRegulationO as I live outside of London where they are called Traffic Management Orders.
0 -
on relevant highway authority site search for definitive map and the actual TMO. From this can establish timeliness. That map is based on some council data than may not be as TMA requires. Could just be an officer marking a road as outside of TMO for mapping when in law it still is under a TMO.0
-
I don't think that road is private either, not that part anyway, due to the tactile paving at the crossing kerb for pedestrians.
That and the continuous DYL tell you that this part of the road at least, is a continuation of the Public Highway.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
The Highways Register that I downloaded from the Council's website says it is.Coupon-mad said:I don't think that road is private either, not that part anyway, due to the tactile paving at the crossing kerb for pedestrians.
That and the continuous DYL tell you that this part of the road at least, is a continuation of the Public Highway.0 -
Says it is what?? Public highway or private property?665321 said:
The Highways Register that I downloaded from the Council's website says it is.Coupon-mad said:I don't think that road is private either, not that part anyway, due to the tactile paving at the crossing kerb for pedestrians.
That and the continuous DYL tell you that this part of the road at least, is a continuation of the Public Highway.1 -
Says it is a Private road. This same register also has notes against other private roads if only parts of them are private, but for the road in question there is no additional comment, therefore I can only infer that it is wholly private.KeithP said:
Says it is what?? Public highway or private property?665321 said:
The Highways Register that I downloaded from the Council's website says it is.Coupon-mad said:I don't think that road is private either, not that part anyway, due to the tactile paving at the crossing kerb for pedestrians.
That and the continuous DYL tell you that this part of the road at least, is a continuation of the Public Highway.
Although I'm still not clear if it makes a material difference to my case (and if it isn't relevant then I won't bother mentioning it again) but hopefully I'll get that nailed down once I receive the court claim.0 -
Date it was unadopted need a timeline ?665321 said:
The Highways Register that I downloaded from the Council's website says it is.Coupon-mad said:I don't think that road is private either, not that part anyway, due to the tactile paving at the crossing kerb for pedestrians.
That and the continuous DYL tell you that this part of the road at least, is a continuation of the Public Highway.
Remember a private road can still have a TMO if landlord agrees. I don't the council just deciding to say road is private to enforce outside of TMA is legal. Only uncertainty is has the process been followed through to amend the TMO to exclude the now unadopted section.
Get onto the Highways Authority and ask. Request relevant council to get the charge removed. Don't stop asking and emailing chair of relevant committee until you get clear answer. This PPC will take it to court. It's worth avoiding that lottery though the offer to contract could be considered an offer of nothing.
If TMO has not been amended correctly it's the council at fault and there can be no enforcement by the PPC.
Ask council. If unhappy with response. Goto Ombudsman where you have better chance of this issue being judged competently.
0 -
Hope that helps. typo above I don't should be I doubt the council..0
-
Also there should be the TMO decision don't assume the map version is the law/rule as written.0
-
I have now emailed the council to confirm this. I probably should have done that a year ago. No doubt I'll hear back in 3 monthsBluefeather said:
Date it was unadopted need a timeline ?665321 said:
The Highways Register that I downloaded from the Council's website says it is.Coupon-mad said:I don't think that road is private either, not that part anyway, due to the tactile paving at the crossing kerb for pedestrians.
That and the continuous DYL tell you that this part of the road at least, is a continuation of the Public Highway.
Remember a private road can still have a TMO if landlord agrees. I don't the council just deciding to say road is private
Cheers0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
