PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Sole proprietor joint mortgage-Deeds

Hi all,
I'm helping a family member get onto the property ladder with a sole proprietor, joint mortgage.

My question, eventually we want to transfer the deeds so that both of our names are on it, do we have to wait until the initial 2 year mortgage is over? Or can we arrange to gift 50% of the house and get my name added to the deeds straight away and avoid SDLT?

Thank you

Comments

  • bucksbloke
    bucksbloke Posts: 439 Forumite
    100 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    If you are doing sole proprietor joint mortgage - your name will not be on Land Registry as an owner, and you'll be required to sign a deed of postponement - which gives the lender rights above your own. 

    You will be taking on a promise to repay a debt which you do not own an asset for. If you are going to do this, get your own independent legal advice away from the family member you are doing this for. 

  • If you want on the deeds why don't you just do a normal joint mortgage now?

    In 2 years time you would still have a sdlt liability when adding yourself to the title
  • db91
    db91 Posts: 4 Newbie
    Second Anniversary First Post
    If you want on the deeds why don't you just do a normal joint mortgage now?

    In 2 years time you would still have a sdlt liability when adding yourself to the title
    Hi Jma,

    Thanks for the response. Would SDLT still be payable? I was reading the HMRC website and found the below.

    Some land and property transactions do not need a SDLT return, including:

    • transactions where no money or other payment changed hands
    Thanks
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,842 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you are putting in capital at the time of the purchase and will have an underlying share in the property, even though not on the title, then you are a "joint purchaser" for the purposes of SDLT.  If you already have a property then the extra 3% SDLT will apply straight away. 

    JBSP mortgages only tend to work well for SDLT if you are "lending your good credit" to help a family member by being liable on a mortgage.  They do not work well where you are putting in capital and expect a share in the property.  There is an article about it here: https://www.blakemorgan.co.uk/joint-borrower-sole-proprietor-mortgages-and-living-together-agreements/
  • @SDLT_Geek if a jbsp mortgage is arranged on a 'lending their good credit' basis and later the joint mortgagor  asked a solicitor to add them to the deeds would this be flagged as being subject to stamp duty?  If no funds changed hands at any point and the joint mortgage clients didn't live together?

    I'm not sure why they would do this though 


  • db91
    db91 Posts: 4 Newbie
    Second Anniversary First Post
    Thanks for the responses.

    Property transactions where no money or other type of payment changes hands

    You can give property or land away or transfer ownership to another person. If there’s no ‘chargeable consideration’ you don’t have to pay SDLT or file a return. The chargeable consideration is a payment that can be cash or another type of payment, including:

    • goods
    • works or services
    • release from a debt
    • transfer of a debt, including the value of any outstanding mortgage
    Regarding the bottom point, if we were to transfer 50% of the property to myself, this would mean paying SDLT on 50% of the outstanding amount on the mortgage yes? However, if we did a normal mortgage, I would have to pay SDLT on 100% of the property purchase price? 

    Just trying to get a better understanding.

    Thanks for your help again. 
  • db91 said:
    • transfer of a debt, including the value of any outstanding mortgage
    Regarding the bottom point, if we were to transfer 50% of the property to myself, this would mean paying SDLT on 50% of the outstanding amount on the mortgage yes? However, if we did a normal mortgage, I would have to pay SDLT on 100% of the property purchase price? 

    Its an interesting question because if its already a joint mortgage then you already have 50% of the debt so there wouldnt be any further transfer.    
    Hopefully someone with more knowledge can clarify although you may need to seek legal advice ultimately
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.