We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Not Married but stuck
Cherryjack
Posts: 1,125 Forumite
I am tenants in common with my ex partner who has not contributed to mortgage since 2014. I have always paid mortgage from my account. Non molestation order was granted in 2014 for domestic abuse. I have two children with him age 8 & 13 (Disabled). He is getting married in September and asking to sort the house out and demanding money with abusive texts. I've had the house valued sent a solicitor letter offering a lump sum, or offering mediation. He has not replied and is not engaging. We are sending another letter but then might have to make an application to court. Will this go against him? I feel is still trying to control and financially abuse me by ignoring me now and would love your thoughts if you have been through something similar. Worried sick as it will cost and absolute fortune to resolve
but if I wait potentially the house will go up in value.
Just trying to move forward, he will need his name off this mortgage to buy a house with his partner.
Just trying to move forward, he will need his name off this mortgage to buy a house with his partner.
0
Comments
-
Do you earn enough to qualify for the mortgage on your own? You won't be able to just 'take his name off the mortgage'.
2024 wins: *must start comping again!*0 -
What lump sum have you offered him, in comparison with the amount of equity? He will be entitled to 50% unless you have very strong evidence of a different agreement or understanding.All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)1
-
Entitled to 50% after paying nothing for the last 6 years? Open to negotiation there, surely?All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0 -
Nope, he owns half of the property so he is legally entitled to half the profits. Same would be the outcome if property had negative equity, he would have to pay half the shortfall to mortgage company.elsien said:Entitled to 50% after paying nothing for the last 6 years? Open to negotiation there, surely?0 -
Elsien unfortunately that is correct. My sister is in a similar situation where she has struggled by herself for the last 6 years yet his share of the equity just continues to rise. She’s tried desperately to remortgage alone etc but can’t do so by herself.0
-
Well, anything is open to negotiation, you can (normally) come to whatever agreement you want, if you are both happyelsien said:Entitled to 50% after paying nothing for the last 6 years? Open to negotiation there, surely?
However, his not having paid since 2014 doesn't change the legal position as to who owns the property - and as it sounds as though CherryJack has been living in the house for the last 6 years it can be viewed as them paying their 'half' of the mortgage and then paying the other 'half' as rent for the use of their ex-partners share of the property.
In court, the issue would be whether there was a mutual intention, shared by both Cherryjack and their ex, that by paying the mortgage they would get a bigger share of the property.All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)0 -
Thank you all for your comments, my solicitor seems to think the court will take into consideration him abandoning his responsibility. Am I being led up the garden path? It's making me think my ex wont reply to my solicitor letters and just turn up in court on the day with no representation and take half
0 -
P.s we are not married and the children live with me0
-
The responsibility of the mortgage? If he got a solicitor (s)he could argue that your ex had to pay rent elsewhere whilst you remained in the house. It boils down to how much you want him out your life and how much he is willing to settle for.Cherryjack said:Thank you all for your comments, my solicitor seems to think the court will take into consideration him abandoning his responsibility. Am I being led up the garden path? It's making me think my ex wont reply to my solicitor letters and just turn up in court on the day with no representation and take half
0 -
Update ex has offered to accept a 15,000 lump sum ..my solicitor feels we should go back and offer 10,000 but I think I could end up with huge solicitor Bill's. My gut feeling is to give the money and close the chapter. My solicitor says I should do a separation agreement. Do I need this as we were not married?
Thank you
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
