PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Prev. estate agent demanding fee

Options
Hi,
I’m hoping someone may be able to offer some advice. I had my house for sale with an estate agent in a sole selling contract. House wasn’t in a great state so didn’t get much viewings etc. Once the contract/time was up I gave the agreed notice and took the house off of the market. They sent the usual list of who they’d “introduced” to the property. I did a few small improvements and 6 months later put it back up for sale with a different estate agent. It sold with this estate agent which took 2-3 months. I have been out of that house for a few months now. I have recently had an email from the first agent stating I owe them the commission as they introduced the buyer to the house originally. (I actually sent the list the first estate agent sent to the second agent so that this would not happen but clearly they didn’t pay attention!) my question is, seeing as it was 6 months later can they actually ask for commission?! Secondly, surely IF they do have a leg to stand on then the second agent should deal / negotiate with them as I sent them the list which they ignored? 
In the email the first agent sent they actually stated that we’d sold the house 2 months before we actually did so they have their facts wrong anyway so I think they are trying it on but I still would like to know where I stand with this if someone can help me please?

Thank you! 

Comments

  • TN1984
    TN1984 Posts: 100 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Was it sold to someone on that list the first agent sent then? What did your first sole agency contract say in respect of those potential buyers introduced during your contract?
  • TN1984 said:
    Was it sold to someone on that list the first agent sent then? What did your first sole agency contract say in respect of those potential buyers introduced during your contract?
    Was sold to someone on that list yes :-( it says.....

    In our Agreement you agreed to pay us a fee of 1% plus VAT in each of the following circumstances:

     

    1. if unconditional contracts for the sale of the property are exchanged in the period during which we have sole selling rights, even if the purchaser was not found by us but by another agent or by any other person, including yourself;
    2. if unconditional contracts for the sale of the property are exchanged after the expiry of the period during which we have sole selling rights but to a purchaser who was introduced to you during that period or with whom we had negotiations about the property during that period.

    But surely they don’t have sole selling rights over the property over anyone who saw the property forever? There has to be a time limit surely?

    thank you 
  • Bossypants
    Bossypants Posts: 1,286 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Possibly not 'forever' - if you'd taken the house off the market then sold it 10 years later, they might struggle - but you're talking about less than a year here, which really isn't that long in the world of house buying. It sounds to me as though you owe them the money, but arguably could claim it back from your other EA because they should have checked the list and known (but so should you!).
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The second agent has no contract with the first, but you do. That's why Agent 2 couldn't care less whether you have to pay Agent 1 or not.
    The moral is to rely on your own diligence
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It sounds to me as though you owe them the money, but arguably could claim it back from your other EA because they should have checked the list and known (but so should you!).
    I think this is most likely to be the correct answer (depending on what the contract with the 2nd agent said). It's not for the agents to sort out between themselves - they don't have contracts with each other, only with you.
  • I think your mistake was relying on the competence of Agent 2.
    Once you knew the name of the buyer, it was your responsibility to check the list yourself.
    Therefore, I think that you do have to pay Agent 1.
  • queen30
    queen30 Posts: 4 Newbie
    First Post
    edited 22 February 2020 at 10:15PM


    Two things to check:
    • Is the first agent a member of the property ombudsman scheme? (Most EAs are.)
    • Were there 6 months or more between the contract with the first EA terminating, and the 2nd EA issuing the memorandum of sale?
    If the answer to both those questions is "yes", the first EA can't claim a fee.

    The first EA would be breaking the Property Ombudsman's mandatory code of practice - so you should complain to the ombudsman. Here's an extract from the mandatory code:

    5t At the time of receiving instructions from a seller you must:
    - point out and explain clearly in your written Terms of Business that you may be entitled to a commission fee if that seller terminates your instruction and a memorandum of sale is issued by another agent to a buyer that you have introduced (see definition of effective introduction (*) and supplementary TPO ‘Dual Fee’ guidance) within 6 months of the date your instruction ended and where a subsequent exchange of contracts take


    Thank you this helps a lot! 
     Thank you thy helps.

    The first EA have said this: 
    The 6 month limitation that you have quoted is from the Code of Practice for Residential Estate Agents issued by The Property Ombudsman (“TPO”), copy attached. This guidance is mandatory for all TPO Members. We refer you to Clause 13. Customer Services and Complaints of the Terms, which explains that we were members of the Ombudsman Services: Property (“OSP”) at the time you signed the Terms, not members of the TPO. Please note that we are now members of the Property Redress Scheme (“PRS”), as explained in the attached Complaints Procedure.

    I have been in contact with second agent who’ve said they can’t now claim commission but I suppose they’re going to say that.

    Thanks again 

  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,031 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    queen30 said:Thank you thy helps.

    The first EA have said this: 
    The 6 month limitation that you have quoted is from the Code of Practice for Residential Estate Agents issued by The Property Ombudsman (“TPO”), copy attached. This guidance is mandatory for all TPO Members. We refer you to Clause 13. Customer Services and Complaints of the Terms, which explains that we were members of the Ombudsman Services: Property (“OSP”) at the time you signed the Terms, not members of the TPO. Please note that we are now members of the Property Redress Scheme (“PRS”), as explained in the attached Complaints Procedure.

    I have been in contact with second agent who’ve said they can’t now claim commission but I suppose they’re going to say that.

    Thanks again 


    OK - Is the second EA a member of the TPO?

    If so, did they follow the the following parts of the code of practice? If not, you might have grounds for a complaint to the TPO against them (and maybe the TPO might tell the second EA to refund part/all of their fee) :


    5t
    - ask the seller if they have previously instructed another agent in respect of the property, and if advised yes:

    - ask to see a copy of the previous agency agreement to ensure that by instructing you, the seller will not be in breach of contract (note that if the seller is unable or refuses to supply a copy, you must advise, in writing, that you are unable to advise as to whether the seller is in breach of their agreement with the previous agent);

    - specifically advise of the possible liability to pay more than one agent; • establish if an interested party has previously viewed through another agent;

    - if an interested party has previously viewed through another agent and makes an offer through you, you must disclose this information and refer the sale back to that agent as they will be deemed to have introduced the buyer (please refer to supplementary TPO ‘Dual Fee’ guidance).

    Link: https://www.tpos.co.uk/images/Codes_2019_a5/TPOE27-8_Code_of_Practice_for_Residential_Estate_Agents_A5_-_Effective_1_June_2019.pdf


  • eddddy said:
    queen30 said:Thank you thy helps.

    The first EA have said this: 
    The 6 month limitation that you have quoted is from the Code of Practice for Residential Estate Agents issued by The Property Ombudsman (“TPO”), copy attached. This guidance is mandatory for all TPO Members. We refer you to Clause 13. Customer Services and Complaints of the Terms, which explains that we were members of the Ombudsman Services: Property (“OSP”) at the time you signed the Terms, not members of the TPO. Please note that we are now members of the Property Redress Scheme (“PRS”), as explained in the attached Complaints Procedure.

    I have been in contact with second agent who’ve said they can’t now claim commission but I suppose they’re going to say that.

    Thanks again 


    OK - Is the second EA a member of the TPO?

    If so, did they follow the the following parts of the code of practice? If not, you might have grounds for a complaint to the TPO against them (and maybe the TPO might tell the second EA to refund part/all of their fee) :


    5t
    - ask the seller if they have previously instructed another agent in respect of the property, and if advised yes:

    - ask to see a copy of the previous agency agreement to ensure that by instructing you, the seller will not be in breach of contract (note that if the seller is unable or refuses to supply a copy, you must advise, in writing, that you are unable to advise as to whether the seller is in breach of their agreement with the previous agent);

    - specifically advise of the possible liability to pay more than one agent; • establish if an interested party has previously viewed through another agent;

    - if an interested party has previously viewed through another agent and makes an offer through you, you must disclose this information and refer the sale back to that agent as they will be deemed to have introduced the buyer (please refer to supplementary TPO ‘Dual Fee’ guidance).



    Did not know any of this....thank you for your assistance! I have looked on the website and they are a member so if all else fails I shall take this route. 

    Many Thanks 
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.