We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Worried about implication
Comments
-
If the account is in the name of the siblings, the mother should not have access to the card for the account.
If the siblings wish to assist their mother with monetary gifts, perhaps they could agree to pay her utilities bills or similar by DD from their account.4 -
They want the mother to get the money and continue to get benefits good for her and them. Your husband runs the risk of being part of benefit fraudTell your hubby to spend his inheritance on you and himwe pay enough for people on benefits2
-
The siblings' mother was divorced from their father. He chose to leave part of his estate to his children (or perhaps they inherited under intestacy).
Their mother's means are modest enough for her to be entitled to means tested benefits.
They want to help her out financially - no reason why they should not do so.
However, this does not mean that she should be given access to cards on an account which is not in her name.2 -
Its benefit fraudxylophone said:The siblings' mother was divorced from their father. He chose to leave part of his estate to his children (or perhaps they inherited under intestacy).
Their mother's means are modest enough for her to be entitled to means tested benefits.
They want to help her out financially - no reason why they should not do so.
However, this does not mean that she should be given access to cards on an account which is not in her name.
5 -
Its benefit fraud
Can you explain this please?
The mother has no right to money from the ex husband's estate. However, their children have inherited from him as their father.
She has no right to expect any help from her children.
The mother's means are modest enough to make her eligible for means tested benefits.
The children wish to give her money to improve her circumstances. How much they give or whether they give is entirely at their discretion.
They do not wish to gift her a lump sum because this could increase her savings and render her ineligible for benefits.
They would therefore opt to make gifts which did not have this effect, perhaps pay for her holiday or her shopping or her clothes or her gas bill.
How can that possibly be fraud?
But the terms and conditions of the siblings' joint bank account would make it quite clear that they should not make their debit cards available to any third party, including their mother.
6 -
-
any money the kids give her as a gift should be declared especially if they need to open a bank account to facilitate the gifts."quote from the poster ,,, While we agree that she should have the money we are worried about the implications of this fraudulent bank account." the gifts are substantial enough to affect her means tested benefits. so avoiding affecting her means tested benefit is fraud.
3 -
For the siblings to open a bank account to hold their own money (and the bequests are their money both legally and beneficially), is not illegal.
It is not benefit fraud for them to make gifts to their mother - see link above.
They should not make their debit cards available to their mother or any other third party.
If they made lump sum gifts to their mother which brought her savings above the relevant amount for means tested benefits, the mother would have to declare the excess capital.0 -
its benefit fraud if mum doesnt declare the gifts as income.
2 -
xylophone said:If the account is in the name of the siblings, the mother should not have access to the card for the account.
If the siblings wish to assist their mother with monetary gifts, perhaps they could agree to pay her utilities bills or similar by DD from their account.
Yep, this is the way to go.
There are lots of ways they can help and keep it above board. They can order an online food shop to be delivered to her regularly, they can set up DDs for her bills, they can take her clothes shopping, pay for a cleaner or ironing service, or gardener, put petrol in her car or put money on an account with a local taxi firm, they can take her on holiday at their expense, they can pay for repairs to her home.
What they can’t do is give her cold hard cash and try to hide the fact, or give her free rein of a bank account they are presenting as nothing to do with her.3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards