PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Help - Estate Management Charge Still Applies After Council Adoption?

Hi all. I wonder if someone could advise me whether my situation is "the norm" or I have options to raise a complaint etc.
We moved into a new build estate (Barratts) around 7 years ago which has around 4 roads and around 100 houses/dwellings. We have a separate estate management company who runs the normal maintenance (Drain Works, Street lighting, mowing of lawns/upkeep of communal areas etc. etc.). Just recently, just our road (no others) has been adopted by the council (not sure of the reasons why). I asked my estate management company whether the service charge would still apply as moving forward, things like repairs to streetlamps and drainage etc. would be carried out by the council. They have stated that we will have a "slight reduction" in our service charge but the fee still applies.
This seems a bit unfair to me in a way as we are effectively paying for the other separate roads ongoing repairs/maintenance etc.?
Does this seem reasonable or not? Would really appreciate people's views. Thank you.
«1

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Generally you're contributing to whatever the "estate" is described as in your titles - that can be anything from just one block of flats, to a vast development. Yes, that does mean you might be paying for them to cut grass you can't see from your house, or to resurface bits of road you have no desire to use.
  • chanz4
    chanz4 Posts: 11,057 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Xmas Saver!
    If ground soloutions challenge them to prove and ask in writing to the council. Do they actually do anything they don't on ours
    Don't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.
  • ethank
    ethank Posts: 2,197 Forumite
    Holiday Haggler I've been Money Tipped!
    You should read your documentation from your purchase as this will detail what the charge is for.
    You may have some roads, public open spaces, grass verges or parks which are not going to be adopted by the local Council.

    Many Councils will now not adopt these items without a commuted sum from a developer. Some just don't want to take them on at all. That is why many developers use these management companies instead.

    You can obtain the accounts of the company and keep on top of them.
  • diggingdude
    diggingdude Posts: 2,482 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Whilst it won't make any difference, people should also write to their MP pointing out the unfairness of councils meeting their housing obligations by having companies build houses which councils can charge council tax for but not supply equal services for that money.
    An answer isn't spam just because you don't like it......
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 13,308 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    bmf_fan wrote: »
    Hi all. I wonder if someone could advise me whether my situation is "the norm" or I have options to raise a complaint etc.
    We moved into a new build estate (Barratts) around 7 years ago which has around 4 roads and around 100 houses/dwellings. We have a separate estate management company who runs the normal maintenance (Drain Works, Street lighting, mowing of lawns/upkeep of communal areas etc. etc.). Just recently, just our road (no others) has been adopted by the council (not sure of the reasons why). I asked my estate management company whether the service charge would still apply as moving forward, things like repairs to streetlamps and drainage etc. would be carried out by the council. They have stated that we will have a "slight reduction" in our service charge but the fee still applies.
    This seems a bit unfair to me in a way as we are effectively paying for the other separate roads ongoing repairs/maintenance etc.?
    Does this seem reasonable or not? Would really appreciate people's views. Thank you.

    It is unfair, but assuming this is a freehold property, you purchased a house with an unregulated charge attached to it.

    The problems with this are only just coming to light and it needs plenty of MPs to fight your corner (or an expensive series of Court cases) before anything will change.
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 13,308 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Whilst it won't make any difference, people should also write to their MP pointing out the unfairness of councils meeting their housing obligations by having companies build houses which councils can charge council tax for but not supply equal services for that money.

    No one is obliged to buy these houses. I wouldn't.
  • paddyz
    paddyz Posts: 175 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    They normally get the council to adopt the roads so council are able to have control for H&S for access and to make planned changes in the future if needed, I work for a housing association and I know Bin lorry’s and gritters often refuse to go into private roads
    Every new development in my HA gets adopted and charges for common areas are in place too, but it should be fully explained when you are signing your tenancy

    If you are private i would have thought it better to be adopted by the council as private management firms can charge for anything and costs could be crippling.
    Mortgage start Oct 12 £104,500
    current May 20 -£56,290_£52,067
    term 9 years aiming on being mortgage free by 7
    Weight Up & down 14st 7lb
  • Nebulous2
    Nebulous2 Posts: 5,580 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Like any flat charge there will be winners and losers. Some people will have greater access to and are more likely to use grass areas. People without children may be paying something towards play areas. You are fortunate in some ways that your street has been adopted, but you still have to pay for the ones that aren't.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 25,929 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    daveyjp wrote: »
    It is unfair, but assuming this is a freehold property, you purchased a house with an unregulated charge attached to it.

    The problems with this are only just coming to light and it needs plenty of MPs to fight your corner (or an expensive series of Court cases) before anything will change.

    I agree that there should be regulation, as there is for leasehold service charges. However, you have bought a house on a private estate, and it’s not at all unfair that you should pay your share of the maintenance.

    Perhaps you should lobby for a reduced council tax?
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 25,929 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Whilst it won't make any difference, people should also write to their MP pointing out the unfairness of councils meeting their housing obligations by having companies build houses which councils can charge council tax for but not supply equal services for that money.

    It won’t do any good. We pay full council tax, even though our kids have grown up and don’t use the local schools any more. We don’t use the social housing department at the local council, nor have our kids been taken into care. It’s totally unfair that we pay full council tax just to get our bins emptied.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.