We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Planning Portal for Idiots

dollythedog
Posts: 38 Forumite

Can anyone please explain the Planning Portal in simple English?
It's very confusing on who is responsible for Building Regulations
https://www.planningportal.co.uk/info/200187/your_responsibilities
at the top it says it's the building owner (regardless of whether approval is needed/applied for)
go down to the left hand 'Building Regulations' box and it says it's both the person carrying out the work AND (if it's not the same person) the building owner
click on the Building Regulations box and the next page says 'if you are employing a builder, the responsibility will usually be theirs - but you should confirm this at the very beginning'
then it goes on to say 'if you are the owner of the building it is ultimately you who may be served with an enforcement notice if the work does not comply with the regulations'
apologies for being dim, but if a building owner confirms responsibility with a builder, how can the building owner still be responsible?
what's the point of agreeing responsibility with a builder if it ends up the owner's responsibility if the builder messes up?
:question:
It's very confusing on who is responsible for Building Regulations
https://www.planningportal.co.uk/info/200187/your_responsibilities
at the top it says it's the building owner (regardless of whether approval is needed/applied for)
go down to the left hand 'Building Regulations' box and it says it's both the person carrying out the work AND (if it's not the same person) the building owner
click on the Building Regulations box and the next page says 'if you are employing a builder, the responsibility will usually be theirs - but you should confirm this at the very beginning'
then it goes on to say 'if you are the owner of the building it is ultimately you who may be served with an enforcement notice if the work does not comply with the regulations'
apologies for being dim, but if a building owner confirms responsibility with a builder, how can the building owner still be responsible?
what's the point of agreeing responsibility with a builder if it ends up the owner's responsibility if the builder messes up?
:question:
0
Comments
-
Because the law makes it ultimately the owner's responsibility because it's their house and asset, so easy for the LA to prosecute.
It's their responsibility to be employing the right people in the first place. Why should the builder 'mess up'? It's the homeowner's ultimate responsibility to specify correctly using the appropriate professionals in both design and build. If they delegate responsibility to a builder, it is delegated, not relinquished.
The builder doesn't own or live in the house, so It's clear who has the vested interest and asset.
Do you want to provide some context here and get the real question answered?Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
the real question is the ambiguity of the Planning Portal: if both the person carrying out the work AND the building owner are responsible, how is that responsibility apportioned?0
-
The homeowner is responsible to the local authority, the builder is responsible to the homeowner IF that has been agreed.
The government aren't interested in your contract with a builder. They'll take the easiest route. How the homeowner then deals with it is up to them.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
aaahhh thank you! that isn't clear anywhere else
it was agreed, builder said local authority permissions were not needed and went ahead doing what he said was ok, I was silly enough to believe him
having found out he was wrong, local authority have been fantastic, visited & approved what they can, I am dealing with the rest
what you've said is SOOOO helpful, thank you again0 -
one last question: the PP also says:
First, if a person carrying out building work contravenes the Building Regulations, the local authority may prosecute them in the Magistrates' Court where an unlimited fine may be imposed (sections 35 and 35A of the Building Act 1984). Prosecution is possible up to two years after the completion of the offending work. This action will usually be taken against the person carrying out the work (builder, installer or main contractor).
doesn't that say the builder has a responsibility to the local authoritygovernment?
that's separate from enforcement notice to the owner, which is 'alternatively or as well'0 -
Just get it done properly and choose a builder that is reputable next time.
They're not going to be prosecuting anyone, they're running on a shoe string.
What did you have done? How many builders did you speak to?Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
I'd love to get it done properly but I can't afford it! if the estimate had been priced for compliance in the first place I'd have known I couldn't afford it and wouldn't have even started
only the one one builder, he's done several kitchen/bathroom/utility refits for me in 2 houses over 12 years, perfect results every time, nothing ever went wrong so I trusted him absolutely
this time it's an integral garage that was being used as utility/storage when I bought the house, it had sink/washer/freezer and tatty old cupboards down the party wall, it was pitch dark and freezing cold
what seems to have gone wrong is that he's treated it like an internal re-fit when it is built to different standards from the house, single brick external wall, damp course in the wall but none on the floor, and I didn't realise the consequences being a simple-minded person who's never had any building work apart from the above stuff that I was so happy with
I asked for the space to be separated so the inside part could be more comfortable utility, the outside part for storage keeping the existing garage door
I asked for a radiator & window in the utility bit
he designed it with a plasterboard dividing wall, nobody realised that by introducing heating it triggered Part L2 of the 2010 regs, the window is structural and the wall should be fireproof so it is classed as 'conversion' and not just the 'internal alterations' he estimated for
I have found all this out over the last couple of months, Building Inspector said it was fine to have a window, I paid for regularisation and that's been signed off, she confirmed it's ok to keep the sink, washer & freezer
to keep the radiator I'd have to rip out everything he's done so far, take the floor up, damp-proof, insulate then re-lay it, reconstruct the partition wall with fireproofing & insulation, insulate the party wall, take out the insulation he's put on the external wall & under the flat roof and re-fit with damp/condensation protection
there's no way I would have accepted an estimate in the first place for all of that, I have paid him already for 50% of the price which includes the non-compliant work, there's no way he will re-do the work to compliance for his price, and I can't afford to pay again for all the extras
I have promised BC (who were wonderfully helpful) to remove the non-compliant work, I do accept responsibility to the local authority, I just couldn't understand what the builder was responsible for and what you said made it all fall into place so you've also been wonderfully helpful
I will never, never trust anyone and make that mistake again0 -
Have they issued the certificate for your window? Just leave it all in place. They won't come back to check, but she can't tell you to keep it for obvious reasons.
When you go to sell, it isn't a proper conversion, so don't attempt to sell it as such.
If you aren't using the garage for cars and flammable product then the fire risk is no more than any other room which doesn't have to be fireproofed.
People have done far worse. At least you didn't pay the price for doing it properly if it isn't.
Just enjoy what you have and come and ask us next time you have building work done and we'll help you with what needs to comply.
That okay?
nb. It's nice to hear your inspector was a ladyEverything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
yes thanks, I have the certificate and the inspector was really great (although at my advanced age she looked like a schoolgirl - am I jealous? yes of course!)
the fireproof bit was about the dividing wall that has to come down, she said a future owner could store fuel in the front storage part, I guess it could be petrol for a mower, or you could easy fit a motorbike in there, so I can see the point
it all makes sense when you understand the rules and I still can't believe my builder didn't realise
the whole Building Regs thing was about selling - I sold my previous house with a genuinely exempt conservatory, the buyers' solicitor asked for written council confirmation which I got no trouble
so this time, because the builder was so sure the garage was exempt, I asked for confirmation so I'd have it ready when the time comes to sell - the rest is history
it was sold to me as 'garage with light, power, plumbing, fridge/freezer space and various wall cupboards, Building Inspector has confirmed in writing that is ok for a garage and I am fine with re-selling as the same
shame there aren't more lady builders about, I reckon I'd get more sense, and nice to know there's a good source of advice here if I ever pluck up the courage to do more than paint the walls ever again!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards