We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Parking Charge Notice / Hire Car / Driver lives abroad

13»

Comments

  • StaffsSW
    StaffsSW Posts: 5,788 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yep, and as they have called it admin, yu can now get them to prove that they have really spent £42 worth of time. given the admin staff who process this are on £10 an hour and it takes 5 minutes, they may struggle...
    A lot depends on the ownership of the vehicle - our hire fleet consists of vehicles owned by ourselves, but also leased in from other suppliers. £15-£20 admin cost per supplier is not unusual and the cumulative cost of these will be passed on. There are more costs involved than just the hourly wage!  That said, we do refund any that are successfully appealed, but we also end up having to spend a lot of time challenging them, even as far as court, where the PPC simply refuse to transfer liability despite doing everything by the book. It's a fairly common trick for a PPC to simply deny ever receiving our documentation, even when it is emailed or sent recorded.  
    (A customer did once challenge us on this actual cost point, but backed down when we justifiably demonstrated that our cost was into three figures. It also didn't help that they failed the attitude test with me....) 

    The BVRLA updated the T&C's in summer 2016, so it is going to be rare to find anyone that is still using agreements that pre-date this. The correct wording makes specific reference to POFA 2012 and parking charges separate from fines, tolls and other costs.

    <--- Nothing to see here - move along --->
  • D_P_Dance
    D_P_Dance Posts: 11,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 February 2020 at 12:49PM
    they've passed on our details to the private parking company (and charged us GBP 42 for the privilege).

    This may well be a breach of contract.

    These so called fines are in fact invoices from ex clampers for monetary recompense for the alleged harm they have suffered at your expense.  You only need pay them if a judge orders it in curt.  If the hireco wil not co-operate complain to their trade association.   
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • Kerry - what you read elsewhere is basically garbage. People talk rubbish
    You must, however, start your own thread. You agreed NOT to hijack threads, when you signed up. 
    StaffSW - yep, however again, those admin costs likely arent fully recoverable either, if challenged properly. The costs spent on running the rest of the business is also NOT recoverable as a discrete charge...
    The BVRLA also signed that crap MoU which means that no hire firm escapes liability for private charges, right? :D
  • StaffsSW
    StaffsSW Posts: 5,788 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The MoU isn't legally binding, only advisory. If we do everything we are meant to in accordance with POFA, all the MoU can request is that we pay and recharge it to make things easier for the PPC.... Yeah, right-oh...  I did try to influence that when it was created by suggesting a post-payment appeal clause - if the hire company did pay it, then the hirer would still have an option to appeal at POPLA, but strangely enough the BPA were not keen on that idea.
    I promised them that I would continue to challenge the PCNs where appropriate, and have stuck to that policy since. 
    <--- Nothing to see here - move along --->
  • nosferatu1001
    nosferatu1001 Posts: 12,961 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I meant the MoU whereby the hire agreement and other docs arent included, meaning the PPC cannot hold the hirer liable...that part :)
  • StaffsSW
    StaffsSW Posts: 5,788 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I meant the MoU whereby the hire agreement and other docs arent included, meaning the PPC cannot hold the hirer liable...that part :)
    Ah yes, the MOU says we just have to provide the details without copies of the hire agreements, which is contradictory to Para 13 of POFA. 
    We ignore that bit - our standard reply letter includes a copy of the hire agreement.

    It's also worthwhile identifying the hirer at every stage prior to court action, then Para 5 (2) can be used against them - if they have already been provided with driver details, they can not instigate action against the keeper.

    The BVRLA are well aware of our opinion on the MoU....
    <--- Nothing to see here - move along --->
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.