We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fine cancelled clause
Richard_Burnsmith
Posts: 1 Newbie
If they dont have a clear photo of the driver they cannot persue the charge.
So if the photo they send doesnt show the driver, eg night, sunlight reflections etc. You do NOT have to tell them who was driving. You have to tell them that you are under no legal obligation to identify rhe driver and they will drop the charge.
So if the photo they send doesnt show the driver, eg night, sunlight reflections etc. You do NOT have to tell them who was driving. You have to tell them that you are under no legal obligation to identify rhe driver and they will drop the charge.
0
Comments
-
Clearly you have not read or understood POFA2012 ???0
-
Where do these people come from?
Sort of person that would fit in well with those Freeman on the land idiots0 -
Richard_Burnsmith wrote: »If they dont have a clear photo of the driver they cannot persue the charge.
So if the photo they send doesnt show the driver, eg night, sunlight reflections etc. You do NOT have to tell them who was driving. You have to tell them that you are under no legal obligation to identify rhe driver and they will drop the charge.
I suggest you read a bit more on here and get better acquainted with the real facts.
Maybe start with the POFA and look into ANPR for starters, then the newbies tread.0 -
I do miss the freeman on the land stuff
Does anyone remember "were bank" some bloke thought he could start his own bank and a lot of people paid up and started sending pretend cheques to water companies etc0 -
Yeah bonkers
OP - just disappear, your advice is garbage.0 -
Cheques signed with a 'wet signature' no doubt!BrownTrout wrote: »I do miss the freeman on the land stuff
Does anyone remember "were bank" some bloke thought he could start his own bank and a lot of people paid up and started sending pretend cheques to water companies etc
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
BrownTrout wrote: »Where do these people come from?
Sort of person that would fit in well with those Freeman on the land idiots
Possibly from the same school of journalism that BBC staff now attend.
Just listened to an item on R4 You and Yours talking about car park fines.
Were there any fines involved?
No, none.
I am old enough to recall when the BBC used to check things like facts but that was a long time ago, sadly.Things that are differerent: draw & drawer, brought & bought, loose & lose, dose & does, payed & paid0 -
oldernonethewiser wrote: »Possibly from the same school of journalism that BBC staff now attend.
Just listened to an item on R4 You and Yours talking about car park fines.
Were there any fines involved?
No, none.
I am old enough to recall when the BBC used to check things like facts but that was a long time ago, sadly.
What was the context of it as i may listen if worth it0 -
0
-
BrownTrout wrote: »What was the context of it as i may listen if worth it
It was regarding new guidelines from the BPA who say that people who genuinely incorrectly put in their number plate details will have to pay "only" a £20 charge for admin and not the charge as issued.Things that are differerent: draw & drawer, brought & bought, loose & lose, dose & does, payed & paid0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards