bwlegal and premier park exceeding maximum stay period

nosferatu1001

Your case was struck out - in your favour
the C then appealed the strike out. 

Sounds like they won their appeal 
So you're back in the normal process. 

Them winning the appeal wasn't unlikely. 

Coupon-mad

Yes you are just likely to be back to square one but telling the Judge about the P/Eye v Somerfield case at the High court was a good thing because hopefully, your Judge will cite it .  I wonder if that's what made him decide to confirm his decision after deliberation...

Please show us when you get the decision, good or bad, so we can see what the appeal Judge has said.

Uptown_Boy

Apologies - I didn't realise that this was one of those rare situations where a PPC has appealed/set aside an Abuse of Process strike out.

FAIR.DEAL

Coupon-mad said:

Yes you are just likely to be back to square one but telling the Judge about the P/Eye v Somerfield case at the High court was a good thing because hopefully, your Judge will cite it .  I wonder if that's what made him decide to confirm his decision after deliberation...

Please show us when you get the decision, good or bad, so we can see what the appeal Judge has said.

Yes, Judge asked for citation of that case, I had to find the case Number.  How long does it take to get the order in the post?

Coupon-mad

Can be weeks, can be months.

beamerguy

FAIR.DEAL said:

Coupon-mad said:

Yes you are just likely to be back to square one but telling the Judge about the P/Eye v Somerfield case at the High court was a good thing because hopefully, your Judge will cite it .  I wonder if that's what made him decide to confirm his decision after deliberation...

Please show us when you get the decision, good or bad, so we can see what the appeal Judge has said.

Yes, Judge asked for citation of that case, I had to find the case Number.  How long does it take to get the order in the post?

Just relax and wait.  All Judges must get their heads around these appeals and abuse of process

We are probably now seeing the first wave of judges looking much closer with these claims and when fake amounts are seen. The result being that no legal will have a clue what a judge will say and it will be done to make an appeal very difficult.

The one point Judges must take from the Salisbury appeal is that the appeal Judge never agreed to the fake £60.   Frankly, making that appeal pointless. 
Watch judges come to the right decision

FAIR.DEAL

Thank you everyone for your support, I won the 2nd case residential parking based on poor evidence of agreement between landlord and private parking company (only one signature and job role not specified) and sign says permit holders only, doesn't say permit has to be displayed clearly.  Judge agreed that I had permit and was displayed. She awarded me £95.  

Thank you again

Le_Kirk

Wow, a result, well done and well done on getting costs.

nosferatu1001

Good to hear!

Coupon-mad

YAY - ANOTHER WY Parking ONE BITES THE DUST!

Well done!