We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
bwlegal and premier park exceeding maximum stay period
Comments
-
Thank you Keith
beamerguy, 2nd from Gladstone but the same use of £60 contractual fees. I’m aware
Nosferatu, landlord is a housing association and seems like there is miscommunication, I doubt they have done anything and I haven’t got anything in writing.
I was hoping to use not replying to SARs in time against them. I had permit on dashboard but was not visible clearly, it was at the bottom edge of my windscreen and mostly covered by shaded area.0 -
Failing to reply to a SAR is not a defence
I dont know why anyone thinks this. ITs not a legal principle that if they do something wrong that excuses any wrong you have done.
Chase up the blooming SAR...4 -
.......... and with a complaint to the ICO.nosferatu1001 said:Chase up the blooming SAR...2 -
Hi,
I would like to share an update on my first PCN; The claim is stuck out as an abuse of process on 29th september. Thank you everyone for your support and help.7 -
Well done, a win is a win!3
-
Can you post a copy of the judge's order please? (Redact any personal details). Did the claimant refer to the Semark-Julien appeal at all?FAIR.DEAL said:Hi,
I would like to share an update on my first PCN; The claim is stuck out as an abuse of process on 29th september. Thank you everyone for your support and help.4 -
Did they not try to argue the Semark-Jullien (Salisbury Court) appeal case to counter the 'Abuse of Process'? Which court and which Judge please?FAIR.DEAL said:Hi,
I would like to share an update on my first PCN; The claim is stuck out as an abuse of process on 29th september. Thank you everyone for your support and help.
Excellent result. 🥂Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street5 -
They have wasted your time, now waste some of theirs. Read this,
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/legal-system/small-claims/making-a-small-claim/
You never know how far you can go until you go too far.1 -
Hi everyone,
I woke up with a pounding headache and some bad news through post. So, Bwldegal applied for the order to be set aside and the claim to be restored and as such a telephone hearing has been arranged on xxxx Their main evidence is this Semark-Jullien case. I don't know what to do now.
Apologies for not replying earlier, I have been very busy. My case was struck out as an abuse of process1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards