We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Ignoring an alternative approach
Comments
-
I have voted for the CUP all my life, I was even a party member in my youth.
However last week I voted for the Green Party because I could not vote for either the blustering liar or the bearded loony.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
BrownTrout wrote: »You mean the British people voted against having a government led by a man who was a friend to terror groups , helped anti semites ruin a great party and would have bankrupted britain
haha, right now I'm watching Parliament on the BBC
Quickly noted that it's back to animal farm. I believe in the break they will bring in carrots and bananas for lunch0 -
Whilst a bit of a faff this sounds like a sensible approach. Perhaps we could use disregard as an alternative word?
Let's not forget half of Newbies can't even manage to find the Newbies thread without assistance. Even then when they do they claim the template doesn't fit their circumstances. :wall:
You are right of course, would you be prepared to voice this in a separate thread as I have done with the Abuse of Process thread and today about DCBL and montha ago with the Debt collectors thread.
Something on the grounds of ..... You ignore debt collectors but before you do read this thread .....
I can then link to the threads above0 -
I though they dined on caviar and chateaubriand in their subsidised canteens. Oink oink.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
I guess that there are a number of people who are prepared for this to be decided at a court hearing for whom this is a matter of principle and however many debt collector's letters are sent they will not engage with the a-se end of the financial industry.
That is why I believe that they should be told when the first letter is received that the should refer back to the PPC because the debt is disputed.
I also think that it adds further weight to removing the fake add on for debt collection.
Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.0 -
Snakes_Belly wrote: »I also think that it adds further weight to removing the fake add on for debt collection.
Very much this ^^0 -
The_Slithy_Tove wrote: »Just look at what happened a week ago ...
Cough...get over it...! :rotfl:
:T:TPRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards