We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Parking Management Company Data Breach

suze200
suze200 Posts: 169 Forumite
edited 30 November 2019 at 1:12AM in Parking tickets, fines & parking
This relates to an unsuccessful POPLA appeal.

The PMC's evidence pack sent to POPLA included a full copy of the appellant's bank statement. POPLA then transferred this evidence pack back to the appellant by Gmail (not a secure method and the recipient of the email may or may not be the owner of that bank statement)

This seems like a serious breach of General Data Protection Regulation. Are there any solicitors on here to advise whether it would be worth pursing the PMC and/or POPLA for data protection breach?

The bank statement had been submitted to the PMC by the appellant to prove they, or an occupant of the vechicle, was genuine a customer of the venue. Of course the appeal was rejected.

There was no need to send the bank statement as the evidence pack also included the original appeal text box which refered to the bank statement and it was mentioned in the PMC's letter to POPLA. So what was to be gained by sending the actual bank statement to POPLA as well?

The venue (a bowling alley) said they couldn't cancel the PCN.

The initial appeal to the PMC was not handled well and the RK admitted to being the driver and was entirely based on being a genuine customer. Other grounds such a signs in extremely small font hidden behind a hedge or on high poles, a redacted contact blanking out who the contact was between etc did not provide a win with POPLA.
«13

Comments

  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I suggest you contact the ICO and ask them
  • suze200
    suze200 Posts: 169 Forumite
    Thanks for the suggestion Redx. I have looked at the ICO website and you cant lodge a complaint with them without first contacting party who committed the data breach.

    If possible don't want to show my hand to the PPC by doing that
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I didn't tell you to lodge a complaint with the ICO

    I said contact them to get their opinion on your queries

    Not the same thing
  • Fruitcake
    Fruitcake Posts: 59,530 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I see no advantage in not telling the scammers, the BPA, and PoPLA that you believe a data breach has occurred, and instruct them not to release this personal data any further.

    I'm not sure why anyone would send an unredacted bank statement rather than one just showing a single payment, but that doesn't alter what has happened afterwards.
    I married my cousin. I had to...
    I don't have a sister. :D
    All my screwdrivers are cordless.
    "You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    edited 30 November 2019 at 10:49AM
    I have looked at the ICO website and you cant lodge a complaint with them without first contacting party who committed the data breach.

    But surely you have contacted them, you said that you sent them the bank statement. You do not wish to lodge a complaint, you want to know if they have acted in a manner which might be complainable.

    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif][FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Nine times out of ten these tickets are scams, so consider complaining to your MP after the election, as it can cause the scammer extra costs and work, and has been known to get the charge cancelled.

    Parliament is well aware of the MO of these private parking companies, many of whom are former clampers, and on 15th March 2019 a Bill was enacted to curb the excesses of these shysters. Codes of Practice are being drawn up, an independent appeals service will be set up, and access to the DVLA's date base more rigorously policed, persistent offenders denied access to the DVLA database and unable to operate.

    Hopefully life will become impossible for the worst of these scammers, but until this is done you should still complain to your MP, citing the new legislation.

    [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, serif]http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2019/8/contents/enacted[/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]

    Just as the clampers were finally closed down, so hopefully will many of these Private Parking Companies.[/FONT][/FONT]
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • suze200
    suze200 Posts: 169 Forumite
    Can someone advise please. Would the following be classed as a "forbidding" sign? So no contract?

    No Authorised Parking
    Terms of parking apply at all times
    Failure to comply with the following at any time will result is a parking charge of £100 reduced to £60 if paid within 14 days
    ! Registered users only Register your vehicle at the payment desk inside xxxx

    The above is all on the same small sign (I cant attach pics)
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 44,330 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Looks to be one. There is no offer to park. At best it's a case of trespass that only the landowner can pursue, and then for only a peppercorn amount.

    But you don't need to persuade us, it will be for you to persuade a Judge.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    #Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • I see you are wrong, yet again. There is an offer to park but you have to be authorised. Forbidding is when there is no offer to park, I hope people don’t listen to you...
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 44,330 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    suze200 wrote: »
    Can someone advise please. Would the following be classed as a "forbidding" sign? So no contract?

    No Authorised Parking
    Terms of parking apply at all times
    Failure to comply with the following at any time will result is a parking charge of £100 reduced to £60 if paid within 14 days
    ! Registered users only Register your vehicle at the payment desk inside xxxx

    The above is all on the same small sign (I cant attach pics)
    Onthewall wrote: »
    I see you are wrong, yet again. There is an offer to park but you have to be authorised. Forbidding is when there is no offer to park, I hope people don’t listen to you...

    Read what it says!
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    #Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • steve1500
    steve1500 Posts: 1,470 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Anyone can report a breach to the ICO - you certainly don't have to speak to the company first

    You would complain to the company if they were misusing your information, before you could ask the ICO to investigate

    For example, you would complain to Parking Lie that they had not complied with Article 13 - we know they don't.

    A couple of weeks later you drive into the same Aldi car park, nothing has changed re the signage. You then complain to the ICO
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.