We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Private landlord issue urgent

13»

Comments

  • I have just re-let my flat through OpenRent (they do ask for proof of ownership). We did not accept the people as tenants until we had got all the paperwork we needed. These included all their credit score references, employer and bank references and copies of their id. We have also seen the original id documents.

    Whether your prospective landlord is in breach of contract I do not know, but I hope you get it sorted soon.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I originally come here for help however a friend then helped me on fb who has a law degree.
    However the costs I am claiming is for losing a house which I had passed all checks but was smaller which is why we took the ither house but due to giving notice on my current property I am due to vacate by the end of Nov so again with that the children's school applications being messed about and then the fact my whole house is packed etc I am claiming to these values as he has breached the contract terms we had agreed.
    Which I feel is sufficient for all issues he has caused etc please advise if you think this is wrong but a judge has final say if he says its not allowed to be that high he will change to what he feels is sufficent if I'm correct.



    Your friend isn't legally qualified. Now most of us here aren't. But I can tell you that you can only claim a quantified loss. And penalty payments you want do not follow the small claims route.


    The risk you have is that your claim could be seen as vexatious and you then risk costs being applied against you, as well as losing your case.


    Break down your actual loss to make up the £2800.


    At the minute I don't see it
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ....
    I have placed £2800 for breach of contract then applied £40 for fuel for visits i made and a further £40 for food and drink for me my wife and children which is what it cost.
    So you've itemised your fuel and food (doubtful you'll get food!).


    But what is the £2800? Unless you break that down and specify how you losses = £2800 it will be thrown out and you'll end up paying costs....
  • There seems to be a bit of confusion here. for breach of contract, you can claim the damages suffered as a result of the failure of the other party to comply with the contract.

    So, for food, the amount you might have a chance of claiming is the increased cost of food - for example if you had to stay in a hotel over and above what food would have cost you had you not.

    If the only alternative accommodation you could find was more expensive, you can claim the difference - but you have to mitigate your losses - If another property was readily available, then you haven't suffered any loss.

    So the amount you can claim is the additional sums that you are out of pocket by virtue of the breach to the extent that they flow directly from the breach. The losses have to be foreseeable (you couldn't for example claim a lost concert ticket cost because you missed a concert to sort all of the mess out) - but you could reasonably expect to claim a more expensive short term accommodation arrangement if you had literally nowhere else to go - and possibly a longer term cost of having to pay more rent if the place you had originally agreed to lease had been below market.
  • phill99
    phill99 Posts: 9,092 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    The classic " I have a friend who says......"
    Eat vegetables and fear no creditors, rather than eat duck and hide.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.