PCS | Rejected appeal with POPLA code

bob07

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Don't mention PCS at all, anywhere. This is PESS you are up against, and the fact they used PCS to do some admin/send letters is irrelevant. Remove all 'PCS'.

Should I mention:
Parking Collection Services on behalf of the creditor: “Parking Enforcement and Security Services”
or
parking operator and / or anyone else acting on their behalf?
any suggestion?

Coupon-mad wrote: »

And you have this section (below) but you haven't said how many minutes is in dispute so how the grace period was breached?

So the pcn just shows a date and time the photography was made, there is no observation period for prooving the car was parked there, the pictures were taken in less than one minute. BPA AOS Code of Practice paragraphs 13.1; 13.3 says that even if the driver has no permission to park there they should allow a reasonable grace period... that's whay no minutes in dispute, they don't mention they provided any period for the driver going away, just took the pictures and done.

So in red are the modifications I made based on your observation.

Thanks a lot.