CEL witness statement received - case going ahead?

richardadc

Umkomaas wrote: »

Have a read here:

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2016/01/new-popla-staying-cases-to-consider.html

I was expecting the Parking Eye sign to offer a contract. By the looks of it, it is still prohibited. If that is the case i take it I should remove the reference to it in my WS?

KeithP

richardadc wrote: »

I was expecting the Parking Eye sign to offer a contract. By the looks of it, it is still prohibited. If that is the case i take it I should remove the reference to it in my WS?

The PE sign does offer a parking contract. It offers the first two hour free and £85 if you stay longer than that, or park outside marked bays or park in appropriately marked bays without showing a blue badge.

richardadc

KeithP wrote: »

The PE sign does offer a parking contract. It offers the first two hour free and £85 if you stay longer than that, or park outside marked bays or park in appropriately marked bays without showing a blue badge.

Ok, but it seems to only offer a contact for customers. If you're not a customer, then it doesn't offer a contract. Am i correct in saying that? If not then my case isn't looking too good as a lot of it is based on the sign of "Permit holders only" not offering a contract for people without permits.

KeithP

A sign that says "Permit Holders Only" is not offering a contract to anyone except permit holders. It is what is often referred to as a 'prohibitive sign'.

richardadc

1505grandad wrote: »

And the Abuse of Process:-

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6014081/abuse-of-process-district-judge-tells-bwlegal

scroll down to post #14

number all paras accordingly

If I use that do I need to include all 124 pages of the parking eye vs beavis case with my WS?

richardadc

WS as it stands is at https://user.fm/files/v2-ae3c73399f0ddffe537715cd7c4c7b25/ws.pdf

Please let me know if I need to change anything. I still need to know if I need to include the beavis case in this.

KeithP

richardadc wrote: »

If I use that do I need to include all 124 pages of the parking eye vs beavis case with my WS?

No.


In your Witness Statement, spell out the Claimant's name in full, as on your Claim Form, in the heading.

Coupon-mad

You put no pages from Beavis except paras 98, 193 and 198, and you read those first and understand why they are mentioned in the words about the abuse of process of the fake added '£60 costs of the operation'.

richardadc

I've noticed between June 2017 and August 2018 at some point there was no sign at the entrance of the card park. Is there something I can reference that has a requirement for there to be one?
Google maps showing no sign

richardadc

Can I just quote part of section 18.2 of the BPA code of practice for the above as per the document at https://www.britishparking.co.uk/write/BPA_AOS_CODE_OF_PRACTICE_CURRENT.pdf?