New Post Advanced Search

Coronavirus: The latest from MSE


The MSE team is working extremely hard to keep the info we have about your travel rights, cancellation rights, sick pay (and more) up to date.
The official MSE guides: NEW MSE Coronavirus Guides

NEWSFLASH 31/3
RESCUE FLIGHTS FOR STRANDED BRITS * SCHOOL MEALS VOUCHERS * BRIGHTHOUSE COLLAPSES

Redundancy and new positions

edited 30 November -1 at 1:00AM in Redundancy & Redundancy Planning
10 replies 2.4K views
anne_stroudanne_stroud Forumite
11 posts
edited 30 November -1 at 1:00AM in Redundancy & Redundancy Planning
Hi


My company are making two departments redundant due to centralisation of roles. Some people have already avoided redundancy as were successful in acquiring a new job in departments not at risk. However this week we have found out that two new positions have recently been filled with people not at risk or on notice. These positions were not advertised internally, just filled by the management. We feel this was very unfair as had the vacancies been advertised lots would have applied for the jobs. Are they obliged to advertise jobs internally so that people can have a fair crack at the whip?
Thank you

Replies

  • Andy_LAndy_L Forumite
    10.9K posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Have you worked there for more than 2 years?

    Are the jobs these 2 people had previously now vacant or have they ceased to exist?
  • edited 31 October 2019 at 2:53PM
    blue.peterblue.peter Forumite
    186 posts
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 31 October 2019 at 2:53PM
    We feel this was very unfair as had the vacancies been advertised lots would have applied for the jobs. Are they obliged to advertise jobs internally so that people can have a fair crack at the whip?
    Morally, I'd agree with you.

    Legally, though, my understanding is that there is no general duty for an employer to advertise job vacancies. However there is an obligation for employers not to discriminate against employees. Can it be argued that the way that the vacancies were filled constitutes discrimination?

    Having said that, many employers - especially large ones - have HR policies that require the advertising of vacancies internally. There might also be an internal policy requiring that precedence be given to people who would otherwise be made redundant. These may have been agreed with the relevant trade union or some other staff reprensentatives. Does your employer have such a policy?

    In practice, policies requiring advertising often don't have much effect beyond delaying the filling of the vacancy. If the relevant manager knows before he or she starts who they want to fill the vacancy, that person is almost certain to get the job, irrespective of other applications. The manager will just go through the motions. Twice I've applied and been interviewed for jobs, only to find that they'd already effectively been stitched up for someone else. On the other hand, I was once "invited to apply" for a job by a manager (with a pretty strong hint that he wanted me in the role), and was duly appointed to it after the other candidates were interviewed. I was not interviewed: the manager in question already knew me well enough to consider it unnecessary. (I had previously worked under him.)
  • edited 14 November 2019 at 12:35PM
    anne_stroudanne_stroud Forumite
    11 posts
    edited 14 November 2019 at 12:35PM
    blue.peter wrote: »
    Morally, I'd agree with you.

    Legally, though, my understanding is that there is no general duty for an employer to advertise job vacancies. However there is an obligation for employers not to discriminate against employees. Can it be argued that the way that the vacancies were filled constitutes discrimination?

    Having said that, many employers - especially large ones - have HR policies that require the advertising of vacancies internally. There might also be an internal policy requiring that precedence be given to people who would otherwise be made redundant. These may have been agreed with the relevant trade union or some other staff reprensentatives. Does your employer have such a policy?

    In practice, policies requiring advertising often don't have much effect beyond delaying the filling of the vacancy. If the relevant manager knows before he or she starts who they want to fill the vacancy, that person is almost certain to get the job, irrespective of other applications. The manager will just go through the motions. Twice I've applied and been interviewed for jobs, only to find that they'd already effectively been stitched up for someone else. On the other hand, I was once "invited to apply" for a job by a manager (with a pretty strong hint that he wanted me in the role), and was duly appointed to it after the other candidates were interviewed. I was not interviewed: the manager in question already knew me well enough to consider it unnecessary. (I had previously worked under him.)
    Andy_L wrote: »
    Have you worked there for more than 2 years?

    Are the jobs these 2 people had previously now vacant or have they ceased to exist?


    Hi Andy and BluePeter


    I have worked there over 15years.
    One job was filled by a colleague returning from maternity leave. Her department did not require her any more, so she was given the choice of taking this other job which was being covered by a temp. We are still required in our roles until next year, so lots of people were interested in the role which was being covered by this temp, but now the opportunity is no longer there.


    The second job was a new position and was given to someone in that department without a single word.


    Our company normally advertise jobs on an internal jobs board, but did not do so in both of these instances.
  • General_GrantGeneral_Grant Forumite
    1.7K posts
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ✭✭✭

    One job was filled by a colleague returning from maternity leave. Her department did not require her any more, so she was given the choice of taking this other job which was being covered by a temp. We are still required in our roles until next year, so lots of people were interested in the role which was being covered by this temp, but now the opportunity is no longer there.

    So the colleague returning from maternity leave was at risk (you say "her department did not require her any more"). She was offered suitable alternative employment which she accepted and, as someone on maternity leave, had legal right to this.
  • So the colleague returning from maternity leave was at risk (you say "her department did not require her any more"). She was offered suitable alternative employment which she accepted and, as someone on maternity leave, had legal right to this.


    The maternity lady's department is not involved in the redundancy process and are not at risk. They just decided they were not busy enough in that department and didn't require her. The manager then placed her into this other role at the same level as hers, without a word to the office. We all have the same job title, but work in different departments.
  • General_GrantGeneral_Grant Forumite
    1.7K posts
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ✭✭✭
    The maternity lady's department is not involved in the redundancy process and are not at risk. They just decided they were not busy enough in that department and didn't require her. The manager then placed her into this other role at the same level as hers, without a word to the office. We all have the same job title, but work in different departments.

    So her job was at risk. She was on maternity leave. That means she has protection to be offered a vacancy.
  • lincroft1710lincroft1710 Forumite
    13.1K posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The maternity lady's department is not involved in the redundancy process and are not at risk. They just decided they were not busy enough in that department and didn't require her. The manager then placed her into this other role at the same level as hers, without a word to the office. We all have the same job title, but work in different departments.

    "Not being busy enough and not requiring her" means there is no job for her, so her job is technically redundant.
  • blue.peterblue.peter Forumite
    186 posts
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Hi Andy and BluePeter


    I have worked there over 15years.
    One job was filled by a colleague returning from maternity leave. Her department did not require her any more, so she was given the choice of taking this other job which was being covered by a temp. We are still required in our roles until next year, so lots of people were interested in the role which was being covered by this temp, but now the opportunity is no longer there.


    The second job was a new position and was given to someone in that department without a single word.


    Our company normally advertise jobs on an internal jobs board, but did not do so in both of these instances.


    I'm very sorry, but nothing you've said suggests to me that the company has done anything legally wrong. It's pretty rough, I know, and I sympathise. But it doesn't appear from what you've said that there's anything that you can do about it.

    You've said that the company normally advertises jobs, but you haven't said that there's any policy requirement to do so in every case. In the absence of such a policy, you probably don't even have grounds for raising a grievance.
  • So her job was at risk. She was on maternity leave. That means she has protection to be offered a vacancy.

    Thank you. Does maternity protection to be offered a vacancy trump offering it to staff on notice of redundancy? I wonder if this person should also have been put on notice of redundancy and applied for this role with the rest of us. I'm not trying to be mean to the returning maternity lady, just wanting to know if the company acted fairly in this case?
  • getmore4lessgetmore4less Forumite
    39.1K posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've helped Parliament
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    What's the time line that could be important in establishing if maternity return trumped the selection process.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Quick links

Essential Money | Who & Where are you? | Work & Benefits | Household and travel | Shopping & Freebies | About MSE | The MoneySavers Arms | Covid-19 & Coronavirus Support