Street lighting in an unadopted street

Barny1979

Altarf wrote: »

Sounds rather selfish given the serious health and safety issues you and the other residents are concerned.

Health & Safety is workplace based.

Altarf

Barny1979 wrote: »

Health & Safety is workplace based.

Heath and safety issues are clearly not exclusive to the workplace, and god knows why you would think they are.

Anyway I was using the same term the OP had used -

3card wrote: »

The general feeling was that whilst we have no problems with this being removed this would make the close very dark causing health and safety issues along with possible security problems

swingaloo

3card wrote: »

Apparently he doesnt want it on his property.

But if it is really on the footpath (which you say has been incorporated into the gardens because they were never finished) then surely it is not on his property as far as the deeds would show.

3card

swingaloo wrote: »

But if it is really on the footpath (which you say has been incorporated into the gardens because they were never finished) then surely it is not on his property as far as the deeds would show.

This is one of our main arguments.
The last plan they sent to us showing the boundaries doesn't even have all the houses on the plans. They are insistent that this plan is correct which is obviously isn't

Its very hard work dealing with someone that hasn't even been to visit to have a look at our complaints

The chair of the county council have told the department we are dealing with to stop any further action until this is resolved

I will keep you updated

Thanks for all the constructive inputs