PPI refused but I have 3 documents with proof.

SonOf

Being told it was compulsory when it was not is a missale reason. However, it is a weak reason because there is virtually no chance of evidence existing to support your allegation. Hence why it is weak.

Every try-it-on/fraudulent complaint also makes the same allegation and half of those don't even have PPI. There has to be something that points to it being likely to have happened.

6 months full pay then 6 months half pay with redundancy in place

That is a good complaint reason where it is a short term unsecured loan (but not a long term/secured loan). You dont mention the debt types that the PPI was related to.

Takmon

DMAX1470 wrote: »

Thanks ByanotherJoe I did state this on my complaint. Others have said my reasoning is weak. I've never done this before but paid for something i didn't need under duress.

How long ago did this all happen? I can never understand people who say they were forced to take out PPI yet don't make a complaint until years and years later.

If you had a bad meal in a restaurant would you not make a complaint until years after :rotfl:

Ganga

Takmon wrote: »

How long ago did this all happen? I can never understand people who say they were forced to take out PPI yet don't make a complaint until years and years later.

If you had a bad meal in a restaurant would you not make a complaint until years after :rotfl:

Plus you could of cancelled the PPI a few months after it starting as you would see it every month on your statements.:o