Cannot find my answer on newbie threads, please advise.

1505grandad

"So the letter from the solicitors is still debt collection stage?"

What name does the sols letter say to pay the monies to?

Money_Savvy

1505grandad wrote: »

"So the letter from the solicitors is still debt collection stage?"

What name does the sols letter say to pay the monies to?

It doesn't state specifically, who the monies would go to. It just states acting on behalf, and contact us to pay...

Money_Savvy

Redx wrote: »

this forum does not allow the hosting of files , including redacted pictures

use imgur or tinypic to host your pictures and link them in your reply (stop assuming that you can upload files wherever you like on the net)

this site does not tell anyone to IGNORE a private pcn and hasnt done since march 2013, it recommends appealing the initial pcn, plus for BPA members to take it to POPLA as a second stage after the initial refusal , hence that NEWBIES thread you read

this forum does tell people to ignore debt collector letters but not an actual formal official LoC letter, plus not to IGNORE a court claim either

you are not at either of those 2 stages yet

you havent said when this occurred but I suspect that as debt collectors are involved , who have used a tracing agent to trace you , that its far too late for any appeal to be made, so there is nothing you can do but sit on your hands for 6 years , awaiting the 2 items I mentioned above

the DVLA not having your email address is irrelevant

Firstly, I state again, that I am not saying I have been advised to ignore the initial letter. I received the initial letter, then a few days later received the debt collection one. I have just noticed they were sent from the same address???

The parking incident was in July, so has been a while?

Does the solicitor latter count as a debt collection letter then?

Many thanks

KeithP

Money_Savvy wrote: »

Does the solicitor latter count as a debt collection letter then?

If the solicitor's letter is not a Letter of Claim and is just an attempt to collect an alleged debt, then of course it can be dealt with as one would any debt collector's letter.

Redx

Money_Savvy wrote: »

Firstly, I state again, that I am not saying I have been advised to ignore the initial letter. I received the initial letter, then a few days later received the debt collection one. I have just noticed they were sent from the same address???

The parking incident was in July, so has been a while?

Does the solicitor latter count as a debt collection letter then?

Many thanks

not been a while its been 2 months , the parking company or their real solicitors have 6 years (72 months) to issue a court case against you, in your local county court

the advice here is to appeal the initial postal NTK pcn within 28 days , then take it to popla , you havent done those 2 items and too late now

a real solicitors letter (or from the parking company) has financial forms included and 30 days notice before court action, we havent seen your letter so no idea if its a real one of a pimped out letterhead, but we all suspect its the latter due to it saying MAY on it

therefore we believer its not a solicitors letter but a debt collection letter with a so called solicitors logo to fool you , if it said WWF you would have thought the WWF had sent it, even if I had sent it on WWF headed notepaper

due to you failing to follow tghe correct appeal procedures at the appropriate times , you are now in a 6 year wait to see if a real LoC comes , or an MCOL court claim from the CCBC in Northampton

yes its complicated , yes they lie and sc@m people , yes they use pimped out letterheaded paper

nobody here believes its a real LoC and its definitely not a court claim, therefore its ignore and come back if either of those 2 real items arrives in the post

nobody here is interested in debt collector letters