We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
PCN from Initial Parking, Newquay, Fistral.
Comments
-
Hi Coupon Mad,
On the Initial Parking website there were several options to pick as my reason for appealing.
I had read on previous threads that I should choose the option “there was not sufficient signage” so this is the option I picked when appealing. There was no “other” option and the next best thing was “I was authorised to park there” which I didn’t pick because of the earlier thread.
Having looked at your post again I noticed you said “DO NOT pick a box that talks about being the driver/not seeing the signs.”
I hastily picked the “there was not sufficient signage” option. I am just wondering... Has this confirmed my driver status and this invalidated me from moving forward in this appeal process? Should I just pay early to avoid the £100?
Best regards0 -
as keeper you can easily google the signage and decide its not sufficient , plus as keeper you (or me) can also read other threads which also talk about inadequate signage etc , so anyone who wasnt driving, plus the actual driver, can google this information in minutes
one recent poster was advised to complain to the BPA about these online options and INITIAL promised the BPA they would fix it such that a keeper can appeal , as keeper , please find it and read it , then complain as KEEPER to the BPA about those options once more0 -
Hi guys,
Just wondering, is this PCN a PoFA compliant example?
hxxps://imgur.com/a/ksJAPNG
Best0 -
https://imgur.com/a/ksJAPNG
What do you think?
Have you compared it with the requirements of PoFA Schedule 4?
You haven't shown us any of the critical dates on the NtK.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
