CCJ Removal By Consent

[Deleted User]

We don't understand why you think you can get out of dodge for all your wrong doings "because you read about it somewhere on the interwebs".

AndyPix

xlnc99 wrote: »

What are you confused about? A company do not remove any CCJ. They agree for an application to remove the CCJ by consent

That's what im confused about .
Why would they agree to that ??

xlnc99 wrote: »

Its standard practice.

It can't be that standard - iv never heard of it before

xlnc99 wrote: »

In my case i told them i did not receive the paperwork and would make payment upon agreement of the CCJ being removed.

So you blackmailed them ?

xlnc99 wrote: »

There are cases in which a CCJ has already been paid and a company has agreed for a CCJ to be removed.

Which cases ? Or are you making that up ?

xlnc99 wrote: »

Alll depends on whether you get the company to agree and whether a judge agrees. Nothing is 100%

All has already been submitted to the court so its past the writing stage, both parties have signed

All sounds very wooly to me - and frankly I don't think it going to happen (or should happen)

[Deleted User]

AndyPix wrote: »

That's what im confused about .
Why would they agree to that ??



It can't be that standard - iv never heard of it before





So you blackmailed them ?





Which cases ? Or are you making that up ?





All sounds very wooly to me - and frankly I don't think it going to happen (or should happen)

TLDR - it happened to other people on the interwebs, along with John Smith round the corner and Jimmy Krankie up the road, therefore it applies to everyone else (regardless of being different situations).

xlnc99

AndyPix wrote: »

That's what im confused about .
Why would they agree to that ??

Why wouldnt they agree to it? They dont lose out on anything. They dont make any payments to the court for the application or do any work. There could also be circumstances in which they are forced to agree, i.e wrong paperwork, person didnt recieve notification, judgement in error etc. It has zero effect on them whether they agree it or not.

It can't be that standard - iv never heard of it before


It is standard. For anyone who has a CCJ or researching this topic it comes up often. A quick google of 'CCJ removed by consent' will show you hundreds of pages filled with information. The first page on Google will actually show full pages of solicitors firms who actually explain the process. Leagle beagle forums have hundreds of these cases. Infact, this very forum has many cases like this including the person on this very thread who did the same thing and was successful.


So you blackmailed them ?

Not sure how you can classify this as blackmail as a judgement is already been placed. So legally they have been awarded the money. They just have to collect it. They can turn around and say no, they wont agree to sign the consent form. They are still owed the money and it still has to be paid.




Which cases ? Or are you making that up ?

Refer to post number 2




All sounds very wooly to me - and frankly I don't think it going to happen (or should happen)

It may well not happen. There is no guarantee at all. Infact its becoming more and more common that judges are rejecting these applications.

[Deleted User]

Why wouldnt they agree to it? They dont lose out on anything

Well, there's the fact that whilst you have a CCJ they can chase you for the money. What's to say you'll say you will pay them and then you don't?

It's also a bit of a reach to present the other guy's case mentioned on this thread as support of your theory when it's a completely different scenario lol.

AndyPix

This whole thing is ridiculous


Best of luck

xlnc99

SSDD23 wrote: »

Well, there's the fact that whilst you have a CCJ they can chase you for the money. What's to say you'll say you will pay them and then you don't?

Its always usually a condition of the consent form if the CCJ is not already paid.

It's also a bit of a reach to present the other guy's case mentioned on this thread as support of your theory when it's a completely different scenario lol.

The thing with a consent form is it does not matter what the situation is. No personal reasons or circumstances need to be given. Its just an agreement between both parties to remove the CCJ. So personal circumstances do not matter for a consent form. Setting aside a judgement without a consent form is a different matter

[Deleted User]

AndyPix wrote: »

This whole thing is ridiculous


Best of luck

Agreed.

...........